Research on the Incentive,Growth Performance and Adjustment Orientation of Local Fiscal Leverage
Yuqing Guo,Xifang Sun,Yang He
2017-01-01
Abstract:The new proactive fiscal policies in China have gained increasing attention from academics,who have mainly focused on whether local government has borrowed too much to sustain a high growth rate,whether the increasing fiscal leverage will induce a fiscal crisis and how to deal with it if so. Our empirical observations indicate that the explicit leverage rate of local governments has not broken the warning line but is very close to it. The regional distribution of debt solvency risk is severely unbalanced,and Western provinces with a low GDP per capita have higher fiscal leverage rates. This paper tries to capture how the traditional debt financing pattern has reduced the effort of local governments to engage in internal risk control and induced a group of irresponsible financing preferences. It also tries to identify the rules that the central government should follow to adjust local fiscal leverage and maintain a balance between risk control and growth promotion. From the perspective of soft budgetary constraints,the literature finds that both emerging and high-income economies have two kinds of incentive to shirk responsibility,namely,the cross-regional incentive arising from"common pool"effect of bailout expectation and the inter-temporal incentive arising from the election competition game of different parties. These two incentives build an inverse U-shaped curve of growth performance for local government leverage. There are three theoretical explanations. The first is"crowding-out effect"of government borrowing. The second emphasizes the dispute between individual rationality and collective rationality. The third uses agency theory to prove that local officials may have an agency opportunism motivation and that their main purpose for debt financing is a self-interest preference rather than public need. However,more empirical evidence is needed to prove whether these theories can explain such facts in China. This paper uses the spatial econometric model and non-linear dynamic threshold method to evaluate the incentives and growth performance of local fiscal leverage from spatial and temporal perspectives. The empirical results indicate that provinces in the irresponsible group have a significant regional contagion effect. The reason is that the traditional cadre evaluation system focusing on growth performance instead of risk control intensifies the irresponsible financing competition in such a group. In the sensitive year of cadre promotion,party secretaries significantly strengthened irresponsible debt financing to highlight performance and increase the probability of promotion. In three types of intergovernmental transfer, the discretionary transfer dominated bailout expectations and irresponsible motivation,and the other two types of transfer reduced its effect. Furthermore,although local government debt financing implies irresponsible motivations,the dynamic growth performance threshold we estimate is at least 10 percentage points higher than the current risk warning line in China. Our study has four main findings. First,the traditional debt financing pattern of Chinese local governments creates a double incentive to shirk responsibility. Second,vertical imbalanced fiscal decentralization increasingly loosens explicit financing limitations and implicit credit contracts between local governments and financial institutions,providing the institutional background for local governments' shirking of responsibility. Third,less developed Western provinces show a stronger short-sign propensity for shirking responsibility. Fourth,local governments' irresponsible financing causes growth performance to have a non-linear threshold effect. The growth performance of fiscal leverage above the threshold value declines rapidly,but does not obviously impede growth. The explicit threshold value is still higher than the Chinese official risk warning line,which leaves policy space for the government to increase the mid-and long-term risk warning line. These results provide strategic choices for the adjustment of local fiscal leverage under the"new normal"economic situation.