Measurement Methods of Land Marketization in China

赵雲泰,黄贤金,钟太洋,彭佳雯,王小丽
2012-01-01
Abstract:Constructing a scientific, objective and easy-calculating measurement method of land marketization will help us to understand and analyze the spatial and temporal differences in land resources allocation of China. In this paper, on the basis of summarizing the measurement methods of land marketization, we first made annual amendment to the weights of land maketization and put forward the plot number measurement method based on dynamic coefficient and the scale measurement method based on dynamic coefficient. Then we compared the characteristics, range of applications, similarities and differences of the results of different methods based on empirical study of land market development in China from 2000 to 2009. Methods of literature study, comparative analysis and empirical analysis were employed. The results indicate that: from 2000 to 2009, land marketization index in China showed a rising trend with fluctuations; with the improvement of land supply policy, land marketization index increased most significantly around the year of 2006, which imply that the administrative intervention of government has gradually decreased while the dominance of market behavior has been continually strengthened. The plot number measurement method based on static coefficient ignores that the marketization degree of land supply type may change over time and lack the measurement of land lease, thus can be applied to short time series study. The plot number measurement method based on dynamic coefficient is suitable for regional study of small-scale with similar land supply types. In conclusion, the determination of marketization weight of different land supply types should take into account the practical effect of each supply type every year; the scale measurement method based on dynamic coefficient, which is developed from the perspective of highlighting land capital and uses transaction price value per area of granting through bidding, auction and listing as the measurement of complete marketization and the ratio of actual land supply revenue to land revenue under complete maketization, can more objectively and comprehensively reflect the degree of land marketization and can be applied to land marketization analysis of long time series under different scales.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?