Abstract:In a series of papers Holmstrom, Milgrom and Roberts have argued that incentives for agents tend to be complementary under certain conditions. A growing body of empirical literature also appears to support this notion. Data constraints, however, have limited the studies to some particular industries or to a selective few aspects in agency contracts. This paper examines the complementarity and substitutability of CEO incentives of more than 300 Chinese state-owned enterprises from a panel data set. The data contain rich information about CEO pay sensitivity; whether the CEO posted performance bond; managerial discretion in production, in employee wage discretion, share of output to sell to the market (versus being required to deliver to the state at lower price); and contract duration. In explaining the interaction of incentives, we extend the framework of Holmstrom and Milgrom (1994) to accommodate the case of multiple signals for the manager's effort for each task. We classify the various incentive instruments into three tasks of CEOs: to pursue current financial performance, to invest for future financial performance, and to work on other activities that yield private benefits. The model then suggests that these three incentive indices should be complementary, and the individual incentives within an incentive index should be substitutes. Our empirical examination confirms these predictions. A side product of getting the conditional correlations is to be able to examine the determinants of the three incentive indices. We find that the determination of CEO incentives for current performance is consistent with the risk-incentive tradeoff hypothesis. The determination of managerial discretion is consistent with the incomplete contract literature that control rights should be matched with the party with superior information and ability. There is also evidence that the government uses contract duration to elicit information.

Research on the Impact of Product Market Competition on Executive Incentive Effect

Study of Managerial Producing Effort and Product Market Competition

Complementarity and Substitutability of CEO Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Excessive Incentive and Corporate Performance: Research Based on Marginal Diminishing Effect and Top Management Team of Chinese Listed Companies

Incentive Pay and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China

Product Market Competition, Ultimate Controlling Structure and Related Party Transactions

The Conflicts between Control Rights and Incentives:An Empirical Analysis on the Effect of Stock Incentives in China

A Study on the Influence of Executive Compensation Incentives on Corporate Performance

An Empirical Study on Influence of Product Market Competition on Corporate Charitable Contributions

The Impact of Product Market Competition on Corporate Environmental Responsibility

Top Executives' Compensation, Industrial Competition, and Corporate Environmental Performance Evidence from China

Operating Risk, Promotion Incentive and Corporate Performance

Political Promotion, CEO Incentives, and the Relationship Between Pay and Performance

An Empirical Study Of The Effects Of Corporate Performance On Managerial Compensation Based On China'S Listed Companies

Research on the impact of equity incentive model on enterprise performance: A mediating effect analysis based on executive entrepreneurship

Executive Compensation,Perks and Performance——An Analysis Based on Cooperative Game Theory

Does the Equity Incentive Implemented in Chinese Listed Companies Really Work?——An Empirical Study Based on the Annual Reports of Chinese Listed Companies from 2005 to 2012

An Empirical Research on the Relationship of Equity Incentive and Performance of Chinese Listed Companies

Market Competition Intensity,Managerial Ownership and Corporate Performance——Empirical Evidences from Perspective of Endogeneity

Do Tournament Incentives Motivate Chief Executive Officers to Be Socially Responsible?

Research on the Influence of Executive Compensation Incentive on Corporate Financial Performance under the Multiple Regulation of Corporate Governance