Abstract:In mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics, protein quantification and protein identification are two major computational problems. To quantify the protein abundance, a list of proteins must be firstly inferred from the raw data. Then the relative or absolute protein abundance is estimated with quantification methods, such as spectral counting. Until now, most researchers have been dealing with these two processes separately. In fact, the protein inference problem can be regarded as a special protein quantification problem in the sense that truly present proteins are those proteins whose abundance values are not zero. Some recent published papers have conceptually discussed this possibility. However, there is still a lack of rigorous experimental studies to test this hypothesis.In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using protein quantification methods to solve the protein inference problem. Protein inference methods aim to determine whether each candidate protein is present in the sample or not. Protein quantification methods estimate the abundance value of each inferred protein. Naturally, the abundance value of an absent protein should be zero. Thus, we argue that the protein inference problem can be viewed as a special protein quantification problem in which one protein is considered to be present if its abundance is not zero. Based on this idea, our paper tries to use three simple protein quantification methods to solve the protein inference problem effectively. The experimental results on six data sets show that these three methods are competitive with previous protein inference algorithms. This demonstrates that it is plausible to model the protein inference problem as a special protein quantification task, which opens the door of devising more effective protein inference algorithms from a quantification perspective. The source codes of our methods are available at: http://code.google.com/p/protein-inference/.

Protein Probabilities in Shotgun Proteomics: Evaluating Different Estimation Methods Using A Semi-Random Sampling Model

ProteinInferencer: Confident protein identification and multiple experiment comparison for large scale proteomics projects

A Combinatorial Perspective of the Protein Inference Problem

Binomial probability distribution model-based protein identification algorithm for tandem mass spectrometry utilizing peak intensity information.

A Three-Stage Search Strategy Combining Database Reduction and Retention Time Filtering to Improve the Sensitivity of Low-Input and Single-Cell Proteomic Analysis.

Improving Label-Free Protein Quantification Methods Using Expectation Maximization-Like Algorithm In Shotgun Proteomics

Comparative analysis of MS/MS search algorithms in label-free shotgun proteomics for monitoring host-cell proteins using trapped ion mobility and ddaPASEF

Staged-probability strategy of processing shotgun proteomic data to discover more functionally important proteins

Bayesian Nonparametric Model for the Validation of Peptide Identification in Shotgun Proteomics

Protein Inference: A Protein Quantification Perspective

Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics

Improving the success rate of proteome analysis by modeling protein-abundance distributions and experimental designs

A Nonparametric Model for Quality Control of Database Search Results in Shotgun Proteomics

Monte carlo simulation-based algorithms for analysis of shotgun proteomic data.

Evolution and Application of Shotgun Strategy for Proteome Study

A likelihood-based scoring method for peptide identification using mass spectrometry

A nested mixture model for protein identification using mass spectrometry

Protein single-model quality assessment by feature-based probability density functions

Protein Inference and Protein Quantification: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Mass spectrometry based protein identification with accurate statistical significance assignment

Protein inference using Peptide quantification patterns