Clinical Significance of Early Recurrences of Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation

刘启明,周胜华,李旭平,周滔,刘振江
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1439.2009.02.012
2009-01-01
Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the prevalence of early recurrences of atrial fibrillation(ERAf) after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation(CPVI),and to determine whether ERAf is predictive of long-term outcome after PV isolation.Method:CPVI was performed using radiofrequency energy in 105 consecutive patients with paroxysmal(78 patients) or persistent(27 patients) Af.Three to four PVs were targeted for isolation in all patients.Pulmonary vein isolation was completed in the 358 PVs that were targeted.Result:Early recurrences of Af occurred in 38 of 105 patients(36%) at a mean of(3.9±2.6) days after the procedure.The prevalence of ERAf was similar in patients with paroxysmal and persistent Af(35% and 40%,respectively,P=0.42).Beyond the first two weeks,at 208±125 days of follow-up,58 of the 67 patients without ERAf(87%) and 13 of the 39 patients with ERAf(34%) were free of recurrence Af in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy(P0.01).Conclusion:ERAf occur in approximately 36% of patients within two weeks after isolation of three to four PVs,and are associated with a lower long-term success rate than in patients without ERAf.However,approximately 34% of patients with ERAf have no further symptomatic Af during long-term follow-up.Therefore,temporary antiarrhythmic drug therapy may be more appropriate than early repeat ablation in patients with ERAf.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?