Abstract:The constitutive elements of a crime are stipulated by the provisions of criminal law.At this point,there is no difference between the four—element constitutive theory and the three —tier criminal system.The sole difference lying between the two theories is whether there is any ranking relationship among the constitutive elements of a crime.The ranking nature of various elements refers that the prior element should not be established after the existence of the posterior one but should act as the prerequisite of the posterior one,thus forms the progressive logical relationship between various elements of a crime.In the three—tier criminal system,the ranking relationship exists in the three tiers of Tatbestandmaessigkeit,Rechtswidrigkeit and Schuld. The three tiers of criminal system correspond to three principles and embody the protection of three kinds of value respectively.Tatbestandmaessigkeit corresponds to the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a special crime,thus safeguards human rights.Rechtswidrigkeit corresponds to the principle of protecting legal interests,and incarnates the value of criminal law to protect the society.And the tier of schuld corresponds to the doctrine of responsibility,and accords with the ethnic or equal value of criminal law.Meanwhile,the ranking relationship among the three tiers functions as the logical guide in the course of conviction in judicature and can ensure its correction.Thus the three—tier criminal system is with scientific nature and should be adopted in China. However,under the four—element constitutive theory,there exists no ranking relationship among the object,objective aspects,subject and subjective aspects of a crime,but only a sort of order which can be changed freely.As for their logical relationship,the four elements are in an interdependent relationship.When determining cases according to the four—element theory,the order from objective judgments to subjective ones is reversed from time to time,and the fact judgments are sometimes confused with the value ones,which would cause practical defects and affect the corrective conviction eventually.

On the Normative Elements of Constitutive Requirements

On the Constitution Normative Foundation of the Legitimacy of Administrative Procedure

On the Status of Expecting Probability inSystem

On apparent Factors of Composing Essentials

On Compulsory Norm and Its Legal Application

Substantive Factors in Jurisdictional Norms

Agency’s Constitutive Normativity: An Elucidation

The Constitution Theory With Four Elements:The Constitution Without Tatbestand

Ranking Nature of Criminal System

Theory of Criminal Constitutive Elements:Relationship Confusion and Conquer

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

Interpretation on Form and Interpretation on Substance:Expounding by Facts and Notion

The Principle of Integrating Subjectivity and Objectivity:Examination from both Deontology and Methodology

The Emergency and Evolvement of the Concept of Type in Criminal Law:Focused on the Development of "Tatbestand" Theory

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

Legal positivism, conventionalism, and the normativity of law

Linguistic norm in legal language and legislative language – The issue of codification

Value Judgments in Criminal Law Interpretation

The Notion of Violating Norms in Criminal Law

Systematic Position of Objective Imputation

Analysis and Critique of Materiality Theory——Inspection Based on German Public Law Theory