LC/ESI-MS Method for the Determination of Trimetazidine in Human Plasma: Application to a Bioequivalence Study on Chinese Volunteers.
Yang Jiao,Mingming Su,Minjun Chen,Wei Jia,Yiqun Chou,Zhongyi Huang,Nanlin Yang,Weida Tong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2006.11.040
IF: 3.571
2007-01-01
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Abstract:A rapid liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS) method with good sensitivity and specificity has been developed and validated for the identification and quantification of trimetazidine in human plasma. Trimetazidine and lidocaine (internal standard) were isolated from plasma samples by protein precipitation with methanol. The chromatographic separation was accomplished on a Xterra MS C18 Column (150mm×4.6mm, 5μm particle size) with the mobile phase consisting of methanol and water (40:60, v/v) (pH 2.0, adjusted with trifluoroacetic acid), and the flow rate was set at 0.6mL/min. Detection was performed on a single quadruple mass spectrometer by selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode (m/z 267.0 for trimetazidine and m/z 235.0 for lidocaine) with the retention time at about 3.47 and 5.05min, respectively. The calibration curve for trimetazidine was satisfactory with regression coefficient 0.9995 over the range of 2.5–100ng/mL in the plasma. The LOQ (S/N=10) was accordingly 2.5ng/mL. The intra-day and inter-day precision expressed as relative standard deviation was 2.83–6.10% and 4.83–5.82%. The method was successfully applied to investigate the bioequivalence between two kinds of tablets (test versus reference product) in 19 healthy male Chinese volunteers. After a single 20mg dose for the test and reference product, the resulting mean of major pharmacokinetic parameters such as AUC0–24, AUC0−∞, Cmax, Tmax and t1/2 of trimetazidine were (673.1±117.6nghmL−1 versus 652.3±121.9nghmL−1), (717.1±120.9nghmL−1 versus 692±128.6nghmL−1), (74.85±12.13ngmL−1 versus 71.93±14.32ngmL−1), (2.312±0.663h versus 2.211±0.608h) and (4.785±0.919h versus 4.740±0.823h), respectively, indicating that these two kinds of tablets were bioequivalent in the Chinese population.