American science education in its global and historical contexts
Alexandra Killewald,Yu Xie
2013-01-01
Bridge
Abstract:International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) showed similar results and met with a similar reaction (IEA 2008). Francis Eberle, executive director of the National Science Teachers Association, asked,“Do we want to be average?”(Toppo 2008). In 2008 Ina VS Mullis, codirector of the center that administers TIMSS, noted with concern the gap between the performance of American schoolchildren and children in the highestperforming Asian countries (Dillon 2008), and the 2010 issue of Science and Engineering Indicators reported that 70 percent of adult Americans said they were dissatisfied with the quality of math and science education in US schools (NSB 2010, Chapter 7, p. 7-42).The news coverage of these test results highlights that, for many Americans, performance in math and science is important both as a measure of ground gained relative to the performance of earlier cohorts of Americans and as an indicator of the United States’ ability to remain dominant in an increasingly competitive global landscape. In the words of Arne Duncan,“We live in a globally competitive knowledge based economy, and our children today are at a competitive disadvantage with children from other countries.…[T] hat puts our country’s long term economic prosperity absolutely at risk”(USA Today 2010). Many other policymakers, educators, and journalists have also raised the concern that, in an increasingly globalized world, the United States may not be improving fast enough to keep up. Thus concerns about the competitive position of American science education are related to fears for the economic future of the United States, particularly in comparison …