Comparison among Five Different Ways in Treatment of Thoracic or Lumbar Tuberculosis

LU Xiao-sheng,ZHAO Jin-min,PENG Hao,LING Shang-zhun,WEI Wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2013.02.006
2013-01-01
Journal of Spinal Surgery
Abstract:Objective To compare clinical outcomes of 5 different ways in treatment of thoracic or lumbar tuberculosis.Methods A total of 156 patients with thoracic or lumbar tuberculosis were retrospectively analyzed.According the surgical procedures,they were divided in 5 groups: percutaneous minimally invasive focal debridement with local chemotherapy in Group A;anterior debridement,interbody autografting and anterior internal fixation in Group B;anterior debridement and posterior bone grafting and fusion in Group C;posterior debridement,bone grafting and posterior internal fixation in Group D;anterior debridement,interbody autografting and posterior internal fixation in Group E.Operation time,blood loss and other indicators were analyzed.Therapeutic effect was assessed by Oswestry disability index(ODI) and kyphotic angle.Results The mean operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and the medical cost had significant differences between Group A and the other 4 groups(P 0.01);but no significant differences existed among the other 4 groups(P 0.05).The average followup periods of 5 groups were over 15 months.No patient relapsed.The differences of ODI and kyphotic angle of 5 groups before and after treatment were statistical(P 0.01).Conclusion The procedures of percutaneous minimally invasive intubation irrigation under CT guidance has the similar therapeutic effect with other 4 methods,but has advantages of shorter operative time,less blood loss and lower medical cost.Therapeutic effect is similar among the others 4 traditional methods,the suitable clinical protocols should be based on individual cases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?