Understanding electrical pulmonary vein antrum for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Further look into super high-density electroanatomic mapping of the left atrium
Jingcheng Chen,Gang Yang,Chang Cui,Weizhu Ju,Hailei Liu,Mingfang Li,Hongwu Chen,Kai Gu,Zidun Wang,Minglong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.014
IF: 6.779
2024-09-14
Heart Rhythm
Abstract:Background Isolation line placed at the pulmonary vein antrum (PVA) area is superior to ostium level in atrial fibrillation (AF) control. However, less is known about the electrophysiological characteristics of PVA. Objective To describe the electrophysiological properties of PVA. Methods High-density mapping of the left atrium was performed in 18 paroxysmal AF (PAF) patients and 9 age- and sex-matched paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) patients. Each PVA was divided into 8, pulmonary vein (PV) into 4 segments. The electrophysiological properties included slow conduction, complex fractionated electrograms, and effective refractory period (ERP). Results The slow conduction was more prevalent at PVA (43.2±19.5 vs. 14.7±13.0 %, P =0.001) and PV (61.9±16.4 vs. 9.1±9.0 %, P <0.001) in PAF patients than in PSVT patients during sinus rhythm (SR). Similarly, the area with complex fractionated electrograms was significantly larger at PVA (133.8 [61.6, 233.2] vs. 0.0 [0.0, 41.4] mm 2 , P =0.011) in PAF patients during SR. The ERP of PVA was longer in PAF patients than in control at the drive length of 600 ms (260 [230, 280] vs. 220 [190, 250] ms, P =0.001) and 400 ms (230 [205, 250] vs. 200 [190, 220] ms, P =0.007). The ERP net difference between the PV and PVA is larger in PAF patients than in control both at 600 ms (40 [20, 70] vs. 10 [10, 30] ms, P <0.001) and (40 [20, 60] vs. 20 [10, 30] ms, P <0.001) at 400 ms pacing, respectively. Conclusion PAF patients have the PVA electrical substrate including slow conduction, complex fractionated electrograms and ERP dispersion.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems