Clinical Study of Different Regimens As Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Local Advanced Breast Cancer

DAI Zhi-jun,WANG Xi-jing,KANG Hua-feng,WANG Ning,LIU Xiao-xu,XUE Xing-huan,XUE Feng-jie,JI Zong-zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2006.14.003
2006-01-01
Abstract:[Objective] To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two different regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for local advanced breast cancer. [Methods] From January 2001 to January 2004, 68 patients with stage Ⅱb-Ⅲ breast cancer were treated with one of two different regimens: CEF, NEF, for 2 cycles every 28 days. Accroding to the effect standard and toxic grading standard suggested by WHO, efficacy and safety were evaluated after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients in CEF regimen received combination of cyclophosphamide (CTX) 500mg/m2, d1, 8; epirubincin (EPI) 50 mg/m2, d1, 8; 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) 500 mg/m2, d1, 8. Patients in NEF regimen received vinorelbine (NVB) 30 mg/m2, d1, 5; EPI 50 mg/m2, d1; 5-Fu 500 mg/m2, d1, 5. [Results] For primary tumor in the breast, the overall response rate (RR) was 47.2 % (17/36) in CEF regimen and 71.9 % (23/32) in NEF regimen. There was no disease progressive(PD) and one patient showed pathologic complete response (pCR) in both groups. For axillary lymph nodes, the overall response rate (RR) was 63.9 % (23/36) in CEF regimen and 87.5 %(28/32) in NEF regimen. Clinically palpable axillary lymph nodes which had been found in all 68 patients before treatment, 30.6 % (11/36) in CEF regimen and 53.1% (17/32) in NEF regimen became impalpable. The major toxicity, including leukopenia, gastroenteric reactions and alopecia were similar in both groups, but neurotoxicity and milieu phlebitis were the unique side-effects of the NEF regimen. [Conclusion] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two different regimens was all effective to the primary tumor and axillary metastatic lymph nodes of local advanced breast cancer, and the side effects were tolerable. Comparing with CEF, NEF regimen has higher efficacy and equal side effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?