CET and CEF Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen in the Treatment of Breast Cancer

魏忠,王锡宏,戴寅,谢钊
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2008.08.026
2008-01-01
Journal of Modern Oncology
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of CET compared with CEF as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of operable breast cancer(OBC).Methods:From July 2005 to March 2007,56 patients with OBC were randomly assigned to 2 groups treated with CET and CEF chemotherapy before operation.All patients were diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration(FNA)cytology.Neoadjuvant chemotherapies of CET containing cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2(days 1),epirubicin 60 mg/m2(days 1)and docetaxel 75 mg/m2(days 1),and CEF containing cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2(days 1),epirubicin 60 mg/m2(days 1),5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2(days 1),administered every 3 weeks for three cycles before local treatment.Toxicity were summarized.Results:The clinical objective responses of Group CET and group CEF respectively were 75 % vs 46.43 %[28.57 %(8/28)of cCR vs 10.71 %(3/28)of pCR,and 46.43%(13/28)PR vs 35.71%(10/28)of PR].Pathological complete responses of group CET and group CEF respectively were found in 4 cases(14.29 %)vs 2 cases(7.14%).Eight cases and 6 cases[33.34%(8/24)vs 28.57%(6/21)of group CET vs group CEF]respectively who had positive FNA results in the axillary lymph node before chemotherapy showed negative results in the surgery specimen.The most common toxicities were neutropenia,alopecia and nausea/vomiting.There was a significant difference in neutropenia grade Ⅲ-Ⅳof Group CET with group CEF,P=0.027.The other adverse effects of 2 groups were no significantly different and they were tolerable and there were no toxic deaths.All patients received operation after chemotherapy,and 8 cases among them received breast-conserving therapy.Conclusion:CET and CEF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen are effective and expand the indication for breast-conserving therapy,which is important in OBC.The combination of CET is more effective than the regimen of CEF,and it is a well-tolerated regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the OBC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?