Diagram: Deleuze’s augmentation of a topical notion
Kamini Vellodi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.2018.1473145
2018-10-02
Abstract:The concept of the diagram, in its common understanding as a representational schema, has enjoyed renewed attention in recent years across the humanities and the social sciences, bolstered in part by the ‘spatial turn’. In line with this trend, recent writing within aesthetics, art theory, and art history has enthusiastically embraced diagrammatics as a tool for analysis. These readings tend to incorporate the diagram within formalist and representational modes of analysis. In contrast, Gilles Deleuze presents a non-representational conception of the diagram that offers a way of thinking of the genesis of works of art as a ‘being of sensation’, the nature of art’s thought as constructive, and the relation of art’s work to art’s history through the ontological foregrounding of ‘difference’. This article sets out these two contrasting positions on the diagrammatic, with three principal aims in mind: (1) to indicate and diagnose the currency of the diagrammatic as a concept within aesthetics and in the analysis of artworks; (2) to place Deleuze within, whilst distinguishing him from, recent readings of the diagram within art history and visual culture, including those of Ernst Gombrich, W. J. T. Mitchell, Benjamin Buchloh, Margaret Iversen, and Frederik Stjernfelt, and in so doing to expose the way in which Deleuze’s philosophy augments wider debates in the philosophy of art; and (3) to unpack and expand critically the role and status of the diagram within Deleuze’s philosophy of art and indicate its implications for aesthetics and art history.