A 4‐year follow‐up of root canal obturation using a calcium silicate‐based sealer and a zinc oxide‐eugenol sealer: A randomized clinical trial
Giulia Bardini,Montse Mercade Bellido,Giampiero Rossi‐Fedele,Laura Casula,Claudia Dettori,Francesca Ideo,Elisabetta Cotti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14167
2024-12-12
International Endodontic Journal
Abstract:Aim This randomized clinical trial assessed the outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment (RCT), comparing a calcium silicate‐based sealer (CSBS) with the single‐cone technique (SC) with a zinc oxide‐eugenol (ZOE) sealer and warm vertical compaction (WVC). Methodology Ninety‐two single‐ and multi‐rooted teeth were divided into two groups and treated using either the SC with BioRootTM RCS (BIO) or WVC with Pulp Canal SealerTM EWT (PCS). Teeth with apical periodontitis (AP) in both groups were further divided into BIOAP and PCSAP subgroups. Standardized instrumentation and disinfection protocols were followed. Periapical index (PAI) was recorded, and clinical and radiographic follow‐ups were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months. Outcomes considered included success rate (under strict and loose criteria), extraction, length of filling, voids, and extrusion rate, as well as changes in PAI score from baseline. Outcome variables and prognostic factors were analysed using binary and multiple logistic regression at p .05). The pattern of PAI reduction was similar in both groups (p = .806). Conclusion Treatment using the SC‐CSBS technique and the ZOE sealer with the WVC technique demonstrated a similar success rate.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine