On the Unite Between Criticism of Marxist Political Economics and Revolutionary Concept of Classical Struggle

ZHANG Wen-xi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8284.2007.01.001

2007-01-01

Abstract:In the formation of historical materialistic theory,people's activities of material production and the change of social conformation,especially for revolution through classical struggles,remain two major dimensions in studying.The close connection between these two fields reveals that studying historical materialistic theory provides a logic precondition for researching historical theory from economic perspective,while the latter functions as an application of the former.Marx employed his revolutionary outlook of classical struggle to criticize and eliminate capitalism through criticism of political economics.Although his logics was involved in economic fields under the influence of his opponent capital classes,this did not prove his criticism stayed in ideology,that of capital classes.However,Marx's understanding of production criticism and historical significance destroy existence of abstract,displaying the role and meaning of proletariate revolution.In the sense of post-modern theory,Marx emphasized functions of economy and could not accept a mechanical outlook of history or rationalism only for the advantage of production mechanism.