Comparation of surgical bleeding complication between two operations in treating patients with OSAHS

CHEN Xiong,XIAO Ying,HE Lie-chun,DONG Jia-qi,KONG Wei-jia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2011.04.006
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the occurrence of surgical bleeding complication during and post operation between conventional uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(UPPP) and modified coblation assisted UPPP(M-CAUP) in treating patients with obstructive sellp apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS), and to explore the more effective, safe and minimally invasive operative method in surgical therapy of OSAHS with less operative complication. Methods It was a parallel controlled trial. A retrospective analysis was made on surgical complication of conventional UPPP and of M-CAUP performed at OSAHS patients in our department since 2004.included criteria:①Patients were operated in general anesthesia with tracheal intubation;②Patients had bilateral tonsillectomy;③Patients had uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(tracheotomy could be included);④ Patients who underwent operation for multi-level airway obstruction were wiped out. 451 patients were in UPPP group and 323 patients were in M-CAUP group. The surgical bleeding complication during and post operation were added up and compared between the two groups. The surgical approach of M-CAUP:①bilateral tonsillectomy by using Arthrocare EVac 70 T&A Wand;②dissect pre soft palate space by using Arthrocare EVac 70 T&A Wand, ablate fat tissure to removed it from the space, avoiding damage of levator palatini muscle and tensor palatini muscle, furthest preserving musculus uvula, maintain the normal structure of oropharynx; ③ablate channel of soft palate by using Arthrocare EVac 55 T&A Wand to reduce the bulk/cubage/volum of soft palate moderately; ④plasty:suture the tonsilar fossa to close the space, interrupted suture mucous membrane of palatine arch and uvula with lamina muscularis in two sides by using 4# silk suture. Result The incidence rate of t primary hemorrhage in M-CAUP group was obviously lower than that in conventional UPPP group(P=0.0005); while the incidence rate of delayed hemorrhage in M-CAUP group was higher than that in conventional UPPP group(P=0.0062). Conclusion The M-CAUP has fewer severe surgical bleeding and then would be more safe compared to the conventional UPPP in surgical intervention of OSAHS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?