Influence of surgical approach for cervical open door laminoplasty in the process of enhanced recovery after surgery
CHEN Xin,LIN Jungui,ZHAO Yanbin,ZHOU Feifei,DIAO Yinze,PAN Shengfa,XIA Tian,WANG Shaobo,SUN Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2023.04.09
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the difference between the transmuscular space approach and the conventional approach in the post-operative recovery process of cervical open door laminoplasty. Methods: Totally 116 patients underwent cervical open door laminoplasty between March 2021 and September 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients with transmuscular space approach were listed as the transmuscular space approach group and patients with conventional approach were listed as the conventional approach group. The operation time, drainage indwelling time, ambulation time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss,postoperative day 1 and day 2 drainage volume, postoperative total drainage volume, decreased volume of albumin and hemoglobin after the surgery, the VAS score of postoperative neck and shoulder pain,Barthel index and improvement rate of spinal cord function were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time in the transmuscular space approach group was significantly higher than that of the conventional approach group [(119.5±46.1)min vs.(68.1±11.4)min, P<0.05]. The indwelling drainage time, ambulation time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative day 1 and day 2 drainage volume, and total postoperative drainage volume were significantly lower in the transmuscular space approach group than in the conventional approach group [(2.21±0.52) d vs.(4.14±1.05) d,(1.05±0.29) d vs.(1.83±0.82) d,(5.16±1.84) d vs.(6.17±1.26) d,(116.5±76.2) mL vs.(172.6±66.2) mL,(110.5±55.3) mL vs.(226.8±70.4) mL,(50.6±35.2) mL vs.(69.0±21.8) mL,(171.6±98.5) mL vs.(377.3±125.9) mL, P<0.05]. The postoperative albumin reduction was less in the transmuscular space approach group than in the conventional approach group with no statistically significant(P>0.05). Postoperative hemoglobin reduction was less in the transmuscular space approach group than in the conventional approach group with statistically significant(P<0.05). There was no statistical differences in the improvement rate of spinal cord function and Barthel index at discharge between the transmuscular space approach group and the conventional approach group(P>0.05). The VAS score of postoperative neck and shoulder pain was significantly lower in the transmuscular space approach group than in the conventional approach group(P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the traditional approach, the transmuscular space approach for cervical open door laminoplasty has the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding, less postoperative drainage, short indwelling drainage time, short ambulation time and early discharge, which can significantly shorten the process of enhanced recovery after surgery and improve the quality of recovery with a high value of promotion.