Abstract:Purpose This study aims to correct errors in, and comment on the claims made in the comment papers of Rigdon (2022) and Henseler and Schuberth (2022), and to tidy up any substantive oversights made in Cadogan and Lee (2022). Design/methodology/approach The study discusses and clarifies the gap between Rigdon's notion of scientific realism and the metaphysical, semantic and epistemological commitments that are broadly agreed to be key principles of scientific realism. The study also examines the ontological status of the variables that Henseler and Schuberth claim are emergent using emergence logic grounded in the notion that variables are only truly emergent if they demonstrate a failure of generative atomism. Findings In scientific realism, hypothetical causal contact between the unobserved and the observed is a key foundational stance, and as such, Rigdon's concept proxy framework (CPF) is inherently anti-realist in nature. Furthermore, Henseler and Schuberth's suggestion that composite-creating statistical packages [such as partial least squares (PLS)] can model emergent variables should be treated with skepticism by realists. Research limitations/implications Claims made by Rigdon regarding the realism of CPF are unfounded, and claims by Henseler and Schuberth regarding the universal suitability of partial least squares (PLS) as a tool for use by researchers of all ontological stripes (see their Table 5) do not appear to be well-grounded. Practical implications Those aspiring to do science according to the precepts of scientific realism need to be careful in assessing claims in the literature. For instance, despite Rigdon's assertion that CPF is a realist framework, we show that it is not. Consequently, some of Rigdon's core criticisms of the common factor logic make no sense for the realist. Likewise, if the variables resulting from composite creating statistical packages (like PLS) are not really emergent (contrary to Henseler and Schuberth) and so are not real, their utility as tools for scientific realist inquiry are called into question. Originality/value This study assesses PLS using the Eleatic Principle and examines H&S's version of emergent variables from an ontological perspective.

Scientific Realism of the Impact of Modern Psychology

The Impact of Modern and Postmodern Thinking on Psychological Counseling and Beyond

The Pessimistic Induction and the Development of Modern Scientific Realism

Psychology Oriented to Changing Reality: Some Necessary Transformations in Methodology

Evolution of Western Theoretical Psychology and Its Methodological Significance

Putting scientific realism into perspective

Research on the Dilemma and Way out of Psychology in Natural Science

Transformation of Study Patterns of Psychological Theory and Its Significance

The Pluralism Trends in Psychological Research:Problems and Prospects

Recent Development in the Western Philosophy of Science

Contemporary Theory Trend of Information Science: Realism and Antirealism

Two Dimensions of Western Psychology——Scientism Psychology and Humanistic Psychology

Scientific Realism vs. Anti-Realism: Toward a Common Ground

Three New Orientations in Western Modern Psychology under Postmodernism Influence

Evolution of SSK in the View of Realism

Rouse's Transcendence Over the Controversies About Scientific Realism

The Integration of Psychology and Linguistics from the Perspective of Cognitive Science—The Example of the Psychological Reality of Language

"Problem-solving Theory" and Its Positive Implications for Theoretical Study of Psychology

Scientific realism, the necessity of causal contact in measurement and emergent variables

Transformation of Research Orientation of Cognitive Science and Its Significance

Review and Reflection of Psychology Research Methods