Abstract:This article argues that the state-society relations in China's digital era are shaped not only by the communication between the citizens and governments but also by the interactions among different levels of governments. Without formal power to keep the government in check, citizens may gain a louder voice through ICTs, yet exert a limited impact on policymaking. Based on a review of policy documents and an in-depth case study of the "One-Go at Most" reform in Zhejiang province, this research argues that the intervention of upper-level governments changes how the citizens and governments interact at the local level. First, the provincial party-government conducts online citizen surveys to collect information on the local governments, aiming to ensure the full implementation of the reform agenda. This strategy also equips the citizens with informal power, which forces the municipal and county governments to be more responsive and accountable with regard to efficient service delivery. Second, the provincial government has initiated the virtual government program to consolidate the new administrative procedures and standards into the cage of codes. This digitalized iron cage constrains the local cadres' discretion and establishes an e-monitoring system. The case of "One-Go at Most" in Zhejiang province provides a vivid example of how top-down mobilized digitalization can lead to a Weberian administrative system that is rational, routinized, and impartial. It is worth noting that the digital iron cage mainly exerts constraints on the administrative system. Stateled digitalization does not lead to formal power sharing between the state and society. This article concludes that the digital Weberian bureaucracy leads to the consolidation of the state's infrastructure power, and the question of whether or not this will facilitate the state's despotic power requires further exploration.

The Dichotomy and Intercourse of Politics and Technology——Taking the Case of "Popular Appraising of Governments" of Zhuhai

Study on the Effectiveness of the Government Portal Website Performance from the User's View

The Mutual Construction of Digital Technology Application and Government Innovation:An Analysis of the Three Lists Digital Reform in Zhejiang,China

Public Participation, Expert Knowledge and Performance Evaluation Mode of the Government:An Inquiry for Analytical Framework of Performance Evaluation Mode of the Government

Analysis of the Theory Foundation and Patterns of Performance Evaluation on the Government's Science and Technology Program

Technology Symbolization: Political Mechanism of Local E-Government Adoption and Implementation

Evaluating Government Portal Websites in China.

A Meta-Analysis Research on E-government Performance Evaluation in China

Evaluation on the Participant Evaluation System on Government Performance

Analysis of the New Character of Government Performance Evaluation of Western Government from the Visual of Compare

The role and influencing factors of government performance evaluation: A test of Chinese public officials’ perceptions in Gaoming district

Survey and Analysis on the Government Performance Appraise in China

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN PUBLIC SECTORS:THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE ANALYSIS

What Values Are Evaluated? an Exploratory Empirical Study of the Public Values Structure in Chinese Local Government Performance Evaluation Through the Case of the ‘hangzhou Model’

Performance Evaluation of Public Institutions: a Chinese Case

User Evaluation Of E-Government Systems: A Chinese Cultural Perspective

From Web to Weber: Understanding the Case of "One-Go at Most" as ICT-Driven Government Reform in Contemporary China

The Significance of Rationality:Politics and Technology——Take Contemporary Chinese ldeas As an Example

A User-centered Evaluation and Redesign Approach for E-Government APP

Performance Evaluation of Province Level Government Owing Based on the strategy Visual Field

Citizen-Participation Performance Evaluation for Local Governments in Mainland China the State of Practice, Analytical Framework and Research Agenda