Abstract:Global economy imbalance is a hidden danger in the world economic growth.It is also a hot topic to discuss in the academic and political circles,which is embodied in the continuous growth of the U.S.current account deficit and trade deficit,in China and other East Asian countries' excessive deposit,huge trade surplus and foreign exchange reserve as well.Nowadays,scholars have divided into two groups in the issue of how to decrease this imbalance.Some U.S.official economists argued that the primary cause of global economy imbalance is due to the excessive deposit and foreign exchange reserve of East Asian countries.They suggest that these East Asian countries,especially China,adjust their economy first.Other foreign economists and some U.S.economists have an opposite viewpoint that the huge U.S.fiscal and trade deficits have caused the global economy imbalance and that adjusting the U.S.economy is a more effective way to change the imbalance.Using the Granger Causality test to study the U.S.trade deficit and the long-term interest rate mechanism,we find that the change of U.S.long-term interest rate could be the Granger cause of the trade deficit change.But on the contrary,trade deficit change does not have much influence on the long-term interest rate.This one-way influence has a certain time lag.The influence will be most obvious when the time lag is three months and will then weaken gradually.According to this result,we can draw the conclusion that the adjustment by the U.S.government to raise the interest rates and reduce the fiscal deficits will be most effective in decreasing the global economy imbalance.However,the final alignment procedure needs various countries' participation and the developing countries may have more pressure in the economic adjustment as the United States may not be so affirmative in adjusting its economy for its own benefit.In this condition,China must take appropriate adjustment in its economy,not only for the world but also for itself.Some policies should be established such as RMB appreciation,monetary cooperation in East Asia,etc.

Imbalance between Financial Development and Global Trade:A Study based on Intertemporal Trade Model

A Study of Effect of Trade Open on Financial Development

China's economic and trade development: Imbalance to equilibrium

Economic Development Pattern and Trade Imbalance: Comparing the U.S. with East Asia

Trade Liberalizations and Global Current Account Imbalances

Comparative Advantage, Endowment Structure, and Trade Imbalances

Are Trade Liberalizations a Source of Global Current Account Imbalances?

Are Trade Liberalizations a Source of Global Imbalances?

Does the China-U.S. Trade Imbalance Stem from Difference in the Comparative Advantages of Service Trade? Empirical Analysis Based on SVAR Model

Financial depth and international trade: evidence from China

Global imbalances and a trade‐finance‐nexus

Impact of internal imbalance of the Chinese macro-economy on international payment imbalance——An empirical study based on Two-gap Model

A Fundamental Cause to Current Account Imbalances:The International Division of Labor Based on the Comparative Advantage

The Contestable Products、Trade Balance and RMB Exchange Rate:The Research on China's Export Market Structure

Financial market development and trade openness: evidence from emerging economies

Two-Way Capital Flows and Global Imbalances: A Neoclassical Approach

Causes of Global Economy Imbalance and Its Adjustment——A Study Based on the Causality Test of US Trade Deficit and Long-Term Interest Rate

Openness,Growth and Balance:An Empirical Study on Trade Development in Transition Economies

Financial Development, Financial Dependence and Manufacturing Export in China

Technology Innovation Capability,Financial Market Efficiency and External Imbalance

On the Connections Between Intra-Temporal and Intertemporal Trades