Abstract:Speech disorders related to cleft lip and palate exhibit different degrees of involvement and can occur even after primary palate repair. Hypernasality can be present as a result of velopharyngeal insufficiency, as well as nasal emission, weak pressure, articulatory errors and facial grimace, affecting speech intelligibility. Palatoplasty outcomes can be variable, and among the influencing factors are the surgical technique, the surgeon's experience, the postoperative care, and the patient/cleft characteristics. The aim of this study was to correlate speech results after primary palate repair with surgical technique and cleft characteristics, using anthropometric measurements and speech assessment in patients diagnosed with cleft lip and palate. A longitudinal, retrospective study with patients who underwent primary palatoplasty between 2015 and 2019 and still attend Craniomaxillofacial Surgery Outpatient Clinic was conducted. Patients were operated on by a single surgeon using the intravelar technique veloplasty with maximal retropositioning of the soft palate elevator muscle. Patients who underwent primary palatoplasty after 2018 had the measurements before and immediately after palatoplasty recorded: length of palate, and the distances from cleft and uvula to posterior pharyngeal wall, and uvula to adenoid. Considering the total of 39 patients, 30 (76.9%) were male, with a mean age of 20.9 months (9–53 mo). All patients had their speech recorded between ages of 60 and 120 months. Speech samples were assessed by 3 different speech pathologists experienced in cleft speech, with an intrarater and inter-rater reliability >80%. The most frequent cleft type was unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (59%). One patient had mild hyponasality, 1 isolated obligatory disorder (nasal turbulence), and 3 patients presented compensatory articulation (2 isolated and 1 also presented obligatory disorder). Only 1 patient had marginal velopharyngeal insufficiency. Postoperatively, there was a mean increase in palate length from 5.4 to 5.6 cm, and a statistically significant decrease in the distance from the uvula to the pharynx wall, with a mean of 1.7 to 1.1 cm ( P <0.001). In general, patients analyzed did not have significant alterations in speech assessment, which did not allow further comparisons and correlation. Therefore, regardless of the anatomic characteristics of the palate, it is possible to achieve good results depending on the handling experience and the technique used.

The effect of palatoplasty timing on speech intelligibility

Effect of palatoplasty timing on incidence of compensatory articulation

Effect of palatoplasty timing on the stability of velopharyngeal closure

The effect of palatoplasty timing on velopharyngeal closure function

The Effect of Palatoplasty Timing on Maxillary Development

[A Primary Clinical Analysis of Artificial Bone Implantation of Cleft Palate].

[Effect of Palatoplasty Timing on the Dental Arch Relationships Between Upper and Lower Jaws].

The Effects of Age at Cleft Palate Repair on Middle Ear Function and Hearing Level

Effect of Palatoplasty on the Middle Ear Status and Hearing Level in Cleft Palate Patients

Perceptual Evaluation and Acoustic Analysis of Pneumatic Artificial Larynx

Comparison of the motion of lateral pharyngeal wall during speech before and after palatoplasty

Speech Outcomes After Primary Palatoplasty and Presurgical Cleft Characteristics: Is There a Predictive Association?

The single Z-plasty for cleft palate repair: a preliminary report.

An Observational Study to Evaluate Association Between Velopharyngeal Anatomy and Speech Outcomes in Adult Patients With Severe Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Acoustic characteristics of consonants in patients with post-palatoplasty velopharyngeal incompetence

Evaluation of postoperative outcomes in palatoplasty with three soft palate cleft repairs

An Analysis of Velopharyngeal Function about Repairing the Hard Palate Cleft with the Composited Artificial Bone after Five Years

[Correlation Analysis of Hearing Level and Soft Palate Movement after Palatoplasty].

The impact of surgical technique and cleft width on the rate of secondary surgery and velopharyngeal function in children with UCLP at 5 years of age

Factors Associated with Delayed Palatoplasty Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Exploring the relationship between cleft type and speech outcome in 4-to-6-year-olds with non-syndromic cleft palate using different measures: A preliminary report