Abstract:For most real-life decisions,people either seek for others’ advice or act as advisors.From the perspective of Construal Level Theory (Trope Liberman,2003;Trope,Liberman, Wakslak,2007),deciding for oneself versus others involves different cognitive processes,and thus leads to divergent preference and decisions.Others,compared to oneself,are psychologically distant.Therefore,people advising for others tend to construct the decision in terms of its end-state or outcome (i.e.desirability aspects);when evaluating personal decisions,however,people will attend to the more specific process to achieve that outcome (i.e.feasibility aspects).Using scenarios,the present study addresses the above issue.Across the two experiments,participants made decisions about supermarket coupons,with various desirability (face value) and feasibility (shopping convenience) combinations.Study 1 investigated the difference in preference when deciding for oneself versus others.165 participants were presented with four types of coupons along desirability (high/low) and feasibility (high/low) dimensions,and then they made decisions either for themselves or someone else.As expected,the self-other decision making difference emerged.While personal decision makers were highly sensitive to feasibility,advisors paid less attention to these low-level aspects.However,such difference only held in low-desirability condition.In Study 2,similarity was introduced to reduce the psychological distance between oneself and others.Two mixed alternatives were constructed with either high desirability and low feasibility or low desirability and high feasibility.81 participants jointly evaluated the two types of coupons and then indicated their willingness to pay for each of them.Results replicated the self-other decision making difference.Compared to personal decision makers,advisors showed stronger preference toward the high-desirability alternative,with less sensitivity to the feasibility aspects.Meanwhile,advice made for similar others (versus dissimilar counterparts) seemed more consistent with personal decisions.The results supported the self-other decision making difference.Interpersonal distance,as a form of psychological distance,exerts significant influence on the cognitive representation and decision making process.The implications of these findings for social distance,advice giving and taking were discussed.

Advice Taking and Judgment in Decision Making

The Effect of Unconscious Emotion on Advice Taking

Cultural Variations in Reasons for Advice Seeking

The Effects of Decision Support Information on Decision-Making Patterns in Systems-Development

The impact of advice uncertainty and individual regulatory modes on advice taking

Advice from artificial intelligence: a review and practical implications

Understanding Advice in Supportive Interactions - Beyond the Facework and Message Evaluation Paradigm

When Should Advice Be Given? Assessing the Role of Sequential Placement of Advice in Supportive Interactions in Two Cultures

Self-Other Decision Making Difference:A Construal Level Perspective

Does More Advice Help? The Effects of Second Opinions in AI-Assisted Decision Making

Learning When to Advise Human Decision Makers

Advice and behavior in a dictator game: An experimental study

Testing an Integrated Model of Advice Giving in Supportive Interactions.

When advisors do not know what is best for advisees: Uncertainty inhibits advice giving

How Expert Advice Influences Decision Making

Decision Making Based Upon the Attribute of Subjective Value:A Quasi Experimental Research

Preferences for advisor agreement and accuracy

Learning to Make Adherence-Aware Advice

The Influences of Message and Source Factors on Advice Outcomes

How Can Decision Making Be Improved?

Reassessing the Integrated Model of Advice-Giving in Supportive Interactions: the Moderating Roles of Need for Cognition and Communication Styles