Abstract:Purpose Prior research has revealed that a large share of managers is reluctant towards the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in decision-making. This aversion can be caused by several factors, including individual drivers. The purpose of this paper is to better understand the extent to which individual factors influence managers' attitudes towards the use of AI and, based on these findings, to propose solutions for increasing AI adoption. Design/methodology/approach The paper builds on prior research, especially on the factors driving the adoption of AI in companies. In addition, data was collected by means of 16 expert interviews using a semi-structured interview guideline. Findings The study concludes on four groups of individual factors ranked according to their importance: demographics, familiarity, psychology and personality. Moreover, the findings emphasized the importance of communication and training, explainability and transparency and participation in the process to foster the adoption of AI in decision-making. Research limitations/implications The paper identifies four ways to foster AI integration for organizational decision-making as areas for further empirical analysis by business researchers. Practical implications This paper offers four ways to foster AI adoption for organizational decision-making: explaining the benefits and training the more adverse categories, explaining how the algorithms work and being transparent about the shortcomings, striking a good balance between automated and human-made decisions, and involving users in the design process. Social implications The study concludes on four groups of individual factors ranked according to their importance: demographics, familiarity, psychology and personality. Moreover, the findings emphasized the importance of communication and training, explainability and transparency and participation in the process to foster the adoption of AI in decision-making. Originality/value This study is one of few to conduct qualitative research into the individual factors driving usage intention among managers; hence, providing more in-depth insights about managers' attitudes towards algorithmic decision-making. This research could serve as guidance for developers developing algorithms and for managers implementing and using algorithms in organizational decision-making.

Advice from artificial intelligence: a review and practical implications

Learning When to Advise Human Decision Makers

Should I Follow AI-based Advice? Measuring Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making

Do Humans Trust Advice More if it Comes from AI? An Analysis of Human-AI Interactions

The Value of AI Advice: Personalized and Value-Maximizing AI Advisors Are Necessary to Reliably Benefit Experts and Organizations

Impact of AI on Human Decision-Making: Analysis of Human, AI, and Environment of Interaction

Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanations

Does More Advice Help? The Effects of Second Opinions in AI-Assisted Decision Making

Three Challenges for AI-Assisted Decision-Making

Beyond Recommender: An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Different AI Roles in AI-Assisted Decision Making

Towards Effective Human-AI Decision-Making: The Role of Human Learning in Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice

Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies

Good advice is beyond all price, but what if it comes from a machine?

Learning to Make Adherence-Aware Advice

Navigating AI in Social Work and Beyond: A Multidisciplinary Review

Does AI help humans make better decisions? A statistical evaluation framework for experimental and observational studies

Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learning

A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice

Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review

Right, No Matter Why: AI Fact-checking and AI Authority in Health-related Inquiry Settings

Decision-making in organizations: should managers use AI?