Abstract:While China has seen rapid economic growth over the last three decades, many studies document a negative correlation between traditional measurements of banking development and economic growth in China. Among many efforts to explain the low efficiency of Chinese banking sector, two arguments focus on the dominance of the four big state-owned banks but they emphasize different facets of the “Big Four.” The ownership-structure view argues that the state ownership of the largest banks and corresponding government interventions in capital allocation should be responsible for the bad performance of the banking sector. The size-structure view states that it is the improper size structure of the banking sector that leads to its low efficiency. This paper aims to empirically disentangle these two different explanations. With data on the banking sector and 28 manufacturing sectors in 30 provinces of mainland China over the period 1999-2007, this paper investigates the differential effects of banking structure on the growth rates of different industries. In order to identify the channel through which banking structure affects industrial growth, the paper constructs two interaction variables: interaction between labor intensity of each industry and banking structure at each province, interaction between the share of non-state-owned firms and banking structure. To capture the purely technological feature of each industry, the paper uses the labor-capital ratio of each U.S. manufacturing sector as a proxy for labor intensity of the corresponding Chinese manufacturing industry. We find that more labor-intensive industries grow faster than more capital-intensive industries in provinces with more active small banks, compared to provinces with more dominant Big Four branches. These results are robust to alternative measures of labor intensity. But the interaction variable used to capture the ownership-structure view is not significant in all the regressions. Thus the results are consistent with the size-structure view while not support the ownership-structure argument.

Resource Allocation and Economic Growth in China

Chinese Political and Economic Governance System and the Imbalance Between Consumption and Investment

Productivity Performance and Investment Efficiency of China's Private Enterprises

Determinants of economic growth in China: Private enterprise, education, and openness

Export Expansion and Economic Growth: Evidence from Chinese Provinces

Urban Economic Growth in China: Theory and Evidence

The Impact of State-Owned Enterprises on China’s Economic Growth

An Empirical Analysis of Influential Factors of China's Capital Allocation Efficiency

State Capitalism Vs. Private Enterprise

Mixed-ownership reform and factor misallocation: Evidence from China

Economic growth of cities: Does resource allocation matter?

Ownership, Government R&D, Private R&D, and Productivity in Chinese Industry

Banking Structure and Industrial Growth: Evidence from China

The relationship between financial resource allocation efficiency and growth in different areas of China

Health, education, and economic growth in China: Empirical findings and implications

Resource misallocation in China: Biased subsidies versus credit discrimination

Entrepreneurship, Private Economy and Growth: Evidence from China

GROWTH AND POVERTY IN RURAL CHINA: THE ROLE OF PUBLIC INVESTMENTS

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY, RESOURCE MISALLOCATION AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE

Long-run Relationship between Inequality and Growth in Post-reform China: New Evidence from Dynamic Panel Model

Education and Economic Development: Evidence from China