Abstract:A firm's RD decisions,and a government's policy-making decisions need to take RD productivity into consideration.Although the measurement of total factor productivity of RD activities based on the knowledge production function is an effective and popular method,findings of other estimation methods remain inconsistent and elusive.In order to better understand the rigor of different estimation methods,we use different proxy indicators,such as the number of new product projects,the number of patent applications,and owners.Three estimation methods,including SRA,SFA and DEA,are adopted to analyze the same province-level panel data collected from medium-and large-sized industrial enterprises.These comparisons enable us to objectively evaluate RD behaviors and efficiency of Chinese enterprises. Our analysis results show that the number of RD personnel and new products are reliable indicators to address multi-product problems,and so is the DEA measurement of RD productivity.The trend of changes in the total factor productivity is consistent across different provinces.Results found in different methods are highly correlated with each other.Another finding is that RD efficiency decreases along with the increased number of new products,but increases with the increased number of patent applications. The most important finding is that the whole RD efficiency level is low.The productivity gap between different provinces shows that there is room for efficiency promotion.RD efficiency is reduced when we use the number of new products as RD outputs.This finding corroborates with the decrease of rankings in Chinese industrial competitiveness this year.As to the contribution of input factors,we find that the human capital's output elasticity is quite lower than the physical capital's.We also find that human capital's output elasticity is much lower than physical capital's.These findings have an important policy implication;that is,an effective method to increase RD efficiency of industrial enterprises should be adopted to sustain industrial and national economic development.

Ownership, Government R&D, Private R&D, and Productivity in Chinese Industry

R&D inputs, firm size and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industry

Productivity Performance and Investment Efficiency of China's Private Enterprises

R&D Performance in Chinese industry

Returns to research and development in Chinese industry: Evidence from state-owned enterprises in Beijing

R&D, Productivity, and Profitability in Chinese Industry

AN EMPIRICAL TEST ON CHINESE HIGH-TECH INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY INFLUENCING FACTORS

R&D, FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS AND PRODUCTIVITY: EVIDENCE FROM THE CHINESE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES

Enterprise Ownership,R & D Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity-Empirical Analysis Based on Industrial Firm-Level Data of China

A Firm's R&D Productivity:An Analysis of Large and Medium-sized Industrial Enterprises in China based on Province-Level Panel Data

Firms＇ Ownership,Financing Source and R＆D Output： Empirical Research on China＇s High-tech Industry

Firm size, R&D, and performance: An empirical analysis on software industry in China

Are Government R&D Subsidies Efficient in China? Evidence from Large and Medium Enterprises

The Impact of Government Subsidies on Private R&D and Firm Performance: Does Ownership Matter in China’s Manufacturing Industry?

Technological regime and knowledge productivity: An industry-level analysis of Chinese manufacturing

The (dis)connection Between R&D and Productivity in China: Policy Implications of R&D Tax Credits

Self-Selection and Performance of R&D Input of Heterogeneous Firms: Evidence from China'S Manufacturing Industries

Resources,Institutions and R&D Intensity:Evidence from Chinese Private Sector

Performance feedback and firms’ R&D frequency: a comparison between state-owned and private-owned enterprises in China

Relative Efficiency Of R&D, Ownership And Industry Concentration In China Based On Dea Approach

R&D and Technology Transfer: Firm-Level Evidence from Chinese Industry