Abstract:The debate on the methodology of constitutional jurisprudence has become much hotter than ever for recent years. The dilemma how the constitutional theories should react to the political realities yields the significant controversy between the political constitutionalism and the normative constitutionalism, which is grounded on the dichotomy of fact and norm. However, either political constitutionalism or normative constitutionalism is insupportable in context of methodology. The political constitutionalism is near to the sociology of law, both of which try to reflect the positive law through inquiring into the social or political realities. However, they seem to be lost in the chains of causation, take the factual interests and purposes as the standards of evaluation and tend to ignore the normativity and legitimacy. Thus it overemphasizes the importance of the unwritten constitution, the policies and the interests at the price of the authority and stability of the constitution. The normative constitutionalism sets its foundation on the positive constitution while has not so much ideas of the sources of its legitimacy and validity. Neither offers it an answer to the question of the philosophical foundation of the constitution as a value—related law. This also affects the concretizing and interpretation of the constitution. As a science of "understanding", the constitutional jurisprudence is neither a pure and strictly logical theory of values nor a pure positive theory or sociology of fact description. The values in the constitution derive from the integration of facts and norms and the integration of the constitutional norms and the realities, and reflect the spirits of our times. To integrate the normative meaning of the constitution and the ever changing realities through the integrative constitutional interpretation is the main issue for modern constitutional jurisprudence.

Forum on Methodology of Constitutional Jurisprudence

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

Reflection on the Methodology of Chinese Constitutional Jurisprudence

The Evolution of Chinese Constitutional Methodology in the Past 3 Decades

A Review of China's Constitutional Law Study

On the Methodology of Economic Jurisprudence

On the Constitutions of Jurisprudence and the Resources As One of Its Elements

Some Fundamental Issues in the Theory of the Legal Method of Criminal law

On Constitutional Politics

AN EXPLORATION OF CHINESE JURISPRUDENCE: STAGES, FIELDS, AND TOPICS BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE

Preamble of Applied Legal Philosophy: Its Attribute and Methods

Methodology of Criminal Jurisprudence

Change and Introspection of Contemporary Chinese Jurisprudence:Insider Observation from the Perspective of Knowledge Sociology

The Theoretical Prospect in the Age of Rights

Some Basic Issues of Contemporary Chinese Jurisprudence

Reflections on the Chinese Jurisprudence——The Nature of Jurisprudence and Different Approaches of Recently Chinese Jurisprudence

Explanation about the Jurisprudence in China: Also a Discussion on Where the Jurisprudence in China Goes

On Innovation from Methodology of Law Economics to Traditional Law Methodology

Clarification of Several Basic Issues in the Current Study of Legal Hermeneutics

Discussion on Research Methodology of Law of Evidence.

The Examination of Globalist Discourse and the Construction of Chinese Legal Philosophy——The Third Part of Knowledge-Critique of Deng Zheng-Lai