Abstract:While China has seen rapid economic growth over the last three decades, many studies document a negative correlation between traditional measurements of banking development and economic growth in China. Among many efforts to explain the low efficiency of Chinese banking sector, two arguments focus on the dominance of the four big state-owned banks but they emphasize different facets of the “Big Four.” The ownership-structure view argues that the state ownership of the largest banks and corresponding government interventions in capital allocation should be responsible for the bad performance of the banking sector. The size-structure view states that it is the improper size structure of the banking sector that leads to its low efficiency. This paper aims to empirically disentangle these two different explanations. With data on the banking sector and 28 manufacturing sectors in 30 provinces of mainland China over the period 1999-2007, this paper investigates the differential effects of banking structure on the growth rates of different industries. In order to identify the channel through which banking structure affects industrial growth, the paper constructs two interaction variables: interaction between labor intensity of each industry and banking structure at each province, interaction between the share of non-state-owned firms and banking structure. To capture the purely technological feature of each industry, the paper uses the labor-capital ratio of each U.S. manufacturing sector as a proxy for labor intensity of the corresponding Chinese manufacturing industry. We find that more labor-intensive industries grow faster than more capital-intensive industries in provinces with more active small banks, compared to provinces with more dominant Big Four branches. These results are robust to alternative measures of labor intensity. But the interaction variable used to capture the ownership-structure view is not significant in all the regressions. Thus the results are consistent with the size-structure view while not support the ownership-structure argument.

Evidences for Foreign Banks' Impacts on the Sectors Source Allocation in China

Evidences for Multinational Banks' Impacts on Regions Source Allocation in China

To What Extent Did the Economic Stimulus Package Influence Bank Lending and Corporate Investment Decisions? Evidence from China

Evidences for Multinational Banks′ Impacts on Firms output in China

Financial spillovers of foreign direct investment: Evidence from China

An Empirical Study on the Locational Choices of Foreign Banks in China

A Study for Threshold Effects of Foreign Bank Entry's Influence on the Efficiency of Domestic Commercial Bank:Evidence from Commercial Banks in China

Local Financial Development and Constraints on Domestic Private-Firm Exports: Evidence from City Commercial Banks in China

Commercial Bank Expansion and Environmental Pollution: Micro Evidence from Industrial Firms in China

The Bank-lending Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission in China

The Locational Distribution of Foreign Banks in China: A Disaggregated Analysis

Allocation of Financial Resources and Green Economic Development: Evidence from China

Banking Structure and Industrial Growth: Evidence from China

Does the target market affect bank performance? Evidence from the geographic diversification of city commercial banks in China

Bank Loans versus Trade Credit: Evidence from China

Bank competition and corporate employment: Evidence from the geographic distribution of bank branches in China

The Source of Agglomeration Economies——Evidence from Firm Level Data

Bank Risk-Taking and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from China

Spatial spillover effects of financial resource allocation efficiency on green economy: Evidence from China

The Local Economic Structure and Growth of Manufacturing Industry:Empirical Evidence from comparison of Jiangsu Province and Zhejiang Province

DOES IMPORTED PRODUCER SERVICE AFFECT MANUFACTURING EXPORT? EVIDENCE FROM CHINA