Ethylene-1-Hexene Copolymerization with A 2,6-Diisopropylphenol Modified Supported Ziegler-Natta Catalyst

Lou Junqin,Liu Xiaoyan,Fu Zhisheng,Wang Qi,Xu Junting,Fan Zhiqiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1105.2009.00748
2009-01-01
Acta Polymerica Sinica
Abstract:This work attempts to prepare ethylene-a-olefin copolymer with relatively narrow composition distribution by modification of TiCl4/MgCl2 type supported Ziegler-Natta catalyst. A TiCl4/ID/MgCl2 type catalyst, where ID is a diester, was treated at room temperature with 2,6-'Pr2C6H3-OH at phenol: Ti molar ratio of 1:1 and the modified catalyst was analyzed for contents of titanium and aryloxy group. It was found that about one third of the titanium atoms in the modified catalyst (M-cat) was connected with an aryloxy group, but its Ti content was decreased to 1.44 wt% from 2.36 wt% of the original catalyst (O-cat). Ethylene-1-hexene copolymerization was conducted in n-heptane with M-cat or O-cat as catalyst and triisobutyl aluminium or methylaluminoxane as cocatalyst. The M-cat showed similar activity as the O-cat in catalyzing the copolymerization, but presented a weaker comonomer activation effect than the latter. The 1-hexene content of copolymer synthesized by M-cat was lower than that of the product of O-cat at the same conditions, but had a markedly narrower composition distribution. Each copolymer sample was fractionated into two fractions by extraction with boiling n-heptane, and the soluble part contains much more 1-hexene units than the insoluble part. The ratio of I-hexene content in the soluble fraction to that of the insoluble fraction was higher than 18 in copolymer prepared with O-cat, but this ratio was reduced to 3.7 when M-cat was used as the catalyst. On the other hand, the soluble part of copolymer prepared with M-cat showed a more random sequence distribution than that of the O-cat. The distributions of active centers in both the M-cat and O-cat were studied by deconvolution of the polymer's molecular weight distribution curves with multiple Flory most-probable distribution function. Both catalysts showed a broad molecular weight distribution that can be ascribed to 5 similar to 6 types of active centers, but the introduction of aryloxy group in the catalyst caused marked changes in the active center distribution. Possible mechanism of the catalyst modification was proposed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?