Clinical analysis of different internal fixations for treatment of displaced clavicle fractures

LI You-de,MA Hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6567.2013.08.001
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and the advantages and disadvantages of different internal fixations for the treatment of displaced clavicle fractures.Methods:A retrospective analysis of 945 cases of clavicular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation from September 1988 to January 2012.The plate was Kirschner pin in 415,memory alloy embracing fixed in 30, "8" wire in 65 and reconstruction plate in 435 of the cases.Results;945 cases were followed up.The time of follow-up were 6 months to 2 years,an average of 12 months.There were no infection and no plate rupture.There were six cases of delayed union or nonunion healing by the reoperation without serious complications in the fixation of Kirschner pin.There were one case of nonunion in the fixation of memory alloy embracing.There were two cases of plate rupture in the fixation of plate by the reoperation with bone graft.The excellent and good rate was 93.97%in intramedullary pin fixation group,93.33%in the shape memory alloy embracing fixator group,92.30%in "8" steel wire fixation group and 99.31%in plate internal fixation group.Conclusion:There was a promising effect in the plate fixation for the treatment of displaced clavicle fractures.The locking plate applications indications should be strictly controlled.The clavicle fracture surgical methods should be determined by the patient' s physical condition,the fracture type and the degree of fracture crushing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?