Abstract:Introduction: Distal clavicle fractures have low rates of union when treated with conservative measures. Operative treatment is generally recommended for Neer type II and V. Multiple fixation methods exist with no clear gold standard. The goal of the current study is to assess the outcomes and complications of distal clavicle fractures treated with one of three fixation methods: standard clavicular plate, hook plate or suture fixation about the coracoid. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of surgically-treated unstable Neer type II and V distal clavicle fractures in adults. These operations were performed by multiple surgeons within a single healthcare system between January 2010 and September 2012. Patients were divided into three cohorts: pre-contoured clavicular locking plates, hook plates, and suture-only fixation methods. Univariate and mulivariate modeling analyses were performed. Results: A total of 74 distal clavicle fractures comprised the final cohort. Fifty-eight (77%) of these fractures were Neer type II; the remaining 16 (21.6%) were Neer type V. Median follow-up time was 12 months (range 10-28). BMI, smoking status, diabetes, and ASA class were similar among all cohorts. Twenty-one patients were treated with suture fixation alone (28.3%), 37 with a contoured clavicular plate (50%) and 16 with hook plate fixation (21.6%). Twenty-one patients (28.4%) experienced complications, including two hardware failures requiring revision surgery. A total of 10/16 (62.5%) patients with hook plates required hardware removal for irritation, compared to 6/37 (16.2%) with a contoured clavicular plate (OR=8.61, p value=0.001), and none with sutures alone. A total of 3/21 patients (14.2%) treated with suture fixation methods were diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis post-operatively; no patients in the plate fixation groups received this diagnosis. The Neer V group had a higher proportion of any complications (37.5%) compared to Neer II (25.9%), and a higher rate of stiffness (12.5% v. 1.7% in Neer II). Conclusion: This study compared the outcomes of three different fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures. The overall union rate with any method of operative intervention was very high (98.6%), consistent with previous studies. Hook plates had a much higher re-operation rate, mostly owing to a higher incidence of hardware removal, an expected outcome owing to the prominence of these plates in the subacromial space. Contoured clavicular plates were associated with a lower incidence of irritation and hardware removal than hook plates, although one patient in this group experienced loss of fracture fixation and went on to asymptomatic radiographic non-union. Suture-only fixation methods had the lowest rate of re-operation, with only one of 21 procedures resulting in failure and requiring revision. However, there was a significantly higher rate of adhesive capsulitis in the suture fixation cohort, perhaps due to the tethering effect of the clavicle to the coracoid or violation of the rotator interval. While this study supports that most distal clavicle fracture fixation methods can achieve stable union, there is a highly variable complication profile associated with each fixation method. The routine use of hook plate fixation cannot be recommended.

Plating Versus Intramedullary Fixation For Acute Displaced Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plating for Extra-Articular Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Arthroplasty versus Internal Fixation for Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- and Long-term Effectiveness.

Improved anterolateral approach to treatment of terminal femoral fractures

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment in the Management of Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Intramedullary nail versus dynamic compression plate fixation in treating humeral shaft fractures: grading the evidence through a meta-analysis.

Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Fixation for the Treatment of Subtrochanteric Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Trial of Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for High-Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

[Effectiveness of minimally invasive internal fixation with locking plates for mid-shaft clavicle fractures]

Using Suture and Locking Anatomical Bridging Plate to Fix Comminuted Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures with Intramedullary Nail Assistance in Reduction.

Which fixation produces the best outcome for distal femoral fractures? Meta-analysis and systematic review of retrograde nailing versus distal femoral plating in 2432 patients and 33 studies

Does plate position influence the outcome in midshaft clavicular fractures? A multicenter analysis

Treatment of bipolar clavicle injury with internal plating: a case series and literature review

Stability of mid-shaft clavicle fractures after plate fixation versus intramedullary repair and after hardware removal

Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation in the Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Complications after surgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures

Treatment of complex proximal humeral fracture: plate and tension band fixation versus conservative therapy.

Dual Versus Single Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Comparison of intramedullary nailing fixation and percutaneous locked plating fixation for the treatment of proximal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis

Intramedullary nail versus locking plate for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: A meta-analysis based on 1384 individuals.

Treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures (Neer type II): A comparison of three internal fixation methods.