The Impact of Different Anastomotic Methods on Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Yi GAO,Danfeng XU,Jizhong REN,Yacheng YAO,Xingang CUI,Jianping CHE,Lei Yin,Ming CHEN,Jie CHEN,Junkai WANG,Yao LI,Lu CHEN,Nengwang YU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2010.12.009

2010-01-01

Journal of Clinical Urology

Abstract:Objective:To compare the effect of two different urethrovesical anastomosis methods applied in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).Methods:From Jan 2009 to Mar 2010,LRP was performed in 52 patients with localized prostate cancer.The patients were assigned into two groups by random:20 of them was performed LRP by using interrupted suture,and 32 of them by running suture.When running suture was performed,the ends of two suture needles with 15 cm 3-0 absorbable catgut was knoted first,followed by 6 o'clock suture in vesical neck from serosa to musoca,and then urethra was anastomosed by these two needles with vesical neck at 3 and 9 oclock respectively,at last these two pieces of catgut were knoted at 12 oclock of vesical neck.Results:The procedure was successfully completed laparoscopically in all 52 cases without transversion to open approach.The mean operating time for interrupted suture was 32.6 min(range from 25 to 41 min),while the mean operating time for running suture was 17.7 min(range from 11 to 27 min).2 of the 20 patients with interrupted suture were suffered from temporary stomal leak for 2 and 3 days respectively,while only 1 of the 32 patients with continunous suture was suffered from a 2 days stomal leak.Conclusions:running suture method can shorten the operation time and reduce the incidence of urine leakage