Comparison of the efficiency of two kinds of urethrovesical anastomosis in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

ZHANG Qifa,XU Danfeng,YIN Lei,CUI Xingang,GAO Yi,LIU YuSha,REN Jizhong,YAO Yacheng,CHEN Jie,CHEN Ming,LI Yao,CHEN Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2012.01.007
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the efficiency of a novel method of urethrovesical anatomosis(UVA)by comparing the operative and perioperative outcomes during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP).Method:From January 2007to April 2011,95patients with 1ocal prostate cancer(LPC)underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy through the placement of two separate needles or a single needle for running urethrovesical anastomosis.They were divided into two groups according to the method of UVA:group A,two separate needles with the ends of the suture knotted together(n=52)and group B,one needle with the end of the suture placed outside(n=43).All patients were judged in the time of operation,UVA,anastomotic leak,stricture urethrotomy,the time of the Foley catheter and the positive margins.Result:Compared with group A,It is possible to shorten both suturing time and operative time by the novel method(group A:179.9min,B:142.8min,P<0.05;group A:22.0min,B:12.9 min,P<0.05),and to obtain a hermetic anastomosis without leakage(group A:15.4%,group B:2.3%,P< 0.05).But there was no significant difference in the incidence of stricture urethrotomy,the time of the Foley catheter and the positive surgical-margin rates.Conclusion:The method of UVA with a single needle in which the end of the suture is placed outside shortens the time of UVA and total operative time,and reduces the incidence of anastomotic leak.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?