A clinical comparative study between LSED and OSED for portal hypertension

Ying-min YAO,Hang TUO,Xin ZHENG,Kang-sheng TU,Qing-guang LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2013.03.002
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective Aim To compare the safety and efficacy between laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization(LSED) and open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization(OSED) in treating portal hypertension with refractory variceal bleeding. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data and complications of 77 patients received OSED surgery and over the same period 67 patients received LSED surgery whom diagnosed of portal hypertension in our hospital from 2002.1—2012.7. Results The LSED group operation time and OSED groups had no significant difference(P=0.757). The LSED group blood loss, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time was significantly less than OSED group(P<0.001,P=0.019). The LSED group postoperative lab data ALT, AST and TBIL was significantly lower than OSED group(P =0.002,P =0.002,P =0.015). No significant difference in postoperative PLT, WBC and Hb between the two groups(P=0.786,P=0.056,P=0.973). The incidence of portal vein system thrombosis as the complications of the LSED group was higher than the OSED group, the other complications between the two groups had no significant difference. Conclusion The LSED surgery has the advantages of safe, less surgery trauma and effective in treating portal hypertension associated with refrctory variceal bleeding.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?