Comparative Observation of Laparoscopic and Laparotomy Surgery in the Treatment of Portal Hypertension

Zhang Jie,Xing Zhi,Liu Xinnong,Li Ping,Guan Wenxian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.02.011
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe and to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and laparotomy splenectomy and pericardial devascularization in the treatment of portal hypertension. Methods From March 2013 to December 2018, clinical data of patients with portal hypertension for splenomegaly, hypersplenism and esophageal and gastric fundus varices were analyzed retrospectively, among them, 21 cases underwent laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization (laparoscopic group) and 50 cases underwent laparotomy of splenectomy and pericardial devascularization (laparotomy group). Statistical analysis were performed by using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative indicators were expressed as (±s) and examined by using independent t-test. The complication rate were compared by using χ2 test. Survival were analyzed by using Kaplan Meier method, and were examined by using log rank test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference. Results Compared with laparotomy group, in addition to much longer operating time(P 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension has the advantages of less surgical trauma, less intraoperative bleeding, faster postoperative recovery, lower incidence of postoperative incision infection, and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of portal hypertension is safe and feasible. Key words: Hypertension, portal; Splenectomy; Laparoscopes; Laparotomy; Comparative effectiveness research
What problem does this paper attempt to address?