Comparison the Performance of Rough Set Theory with Decision Tree and Regress Analysis in Prediction the Degree of Glioma on routine MR images

Lu Youran,Feng Xiaoyuan,Liang Zonghui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2010.06.003
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:In this study we were to compare rough set with Decision tree and two-binary-logistic-regression for the grade diagnosis of glioma on MR images and to evaluate the effect of Rough set to the others' diagnostic performance.Methods:MR images of 275 patients with gliomas (151 low-grade gliomas,124 high-grade gliomas) examined before surgery were collected.The features of MRI with gliomas included numbers,shape,margin,edema,necrosis,mass effect,calcification,hemorrhage,intensity of T1WI and T2WI,enhancement style after administration of contrast agent.The attributes of glioma was reduced by genetic algorithm in Rosetta software with Rough set and then the diagnostic rules about the grade diagnosis came from reduced attributes.The diagnostic rules were calculated by CR&T algorithm in decision tree and an equation was constructed to predict the grade of glioma in two-binary-Logistic-Regression.Results:The accuracy,sensitivity and Specificity of Rough set,Decision tree and two binary Logistic Regression were 84.4%,83.3%,83.6%;75%,74.2%,79.8%;92.1%,91.3%,86.8% respectively.The averaged area under the ROC curve of the three methods above were 0.92,0.907,0.902,and there were no significant differences among the AUROCs above.Compared to the other methods,more definitive rules could get from Rough set.Conclusion:Rough set had good diagnosis performance as well as that of decision tree and regression methods.With the explicit and definitive rules,Rough set was more suitable for practice in diagnosis by experts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?