Abstract:The integrated development of urban and rural areas requires that the government take responsibility for the overall development of the countryside. Chinese agricultural and rural policies characterized by state intervention and government leadership have played an important role in promoting agricultural development and increasing farmers' incomes as well as balancing development in urban and rural areas. However, the effectiveness of current agricultural policies in promoting agricultural productivity is now clearly leveling off. Given this situation, the authors argue that it is imperative to construct a new analytical framework featuring government regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development. In this framework, the government must clearly define the boundaries between its activities and those of the market and rural social organizations. While fully respecting the fundamental role of the market in allocation of resources and rural self-management, the government should exercise its power as a backstop. Further, the government needs to establish a logical sequence for government functions such as formulating the basic operating system of the market and society, correcting market failure and social dysfunction and cultivating market/social entities. To use this new analytical framework to strengthen and improve its regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development, the government needs to reform the basic rural management and agricultural support and protection systems and to pay attention to the cultivation of market entities in agricultural production on the basis of agricultural marketization. Furthermore, it needs to construct a basic urban-rural integrated public service system with the government as the leading actor, carry out innovations in the management system of rural society and fully mobilize the social forces to take part in the administration of public affairs. It also needs to reconstruct the system of government administration and management to ensure the thorough implementation of agricultural and rural development policies.

Efficiency: Still the Objective of "Efficacy Revolution"

Market-oriented Reform of Administration in Incremental Construction Land Quota

The Micro Administrative Mechanism of Land Reallocation in Land Consolidation: A Perspective from Collective Action

Reflections on the Transformation of Local Government Function --the Case of Zhejiang Province

The Tactics to Improve Administrative Efficiency

Local government reform in China: a rational actor perspective

The Institutional Logic of the Evolution of Land Consolidation Policy in China:Analytical Framework and Historical Observation

Seizing the Initiative in Economic Growth:A theoretical hypothesis and case study of the Chinese local governments' strategies responding to the reformation of market economy

Renovation on Principles of Urban General Planning from Public Managements Perspective

The Relationship Between Government on One Side and the Market and Society on the Other in China's Agricultural and Rural Development: an Analytical Framework

To a Question of Effective Management in the Sphere of Land Improvement by Local Government Bodies

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

The Reformation Of "Province Leading Counties Directly" In China: Effects, Problems And Countermeasures

CONTINUITY VERSUS CHANGE: EVOLVING TRAJECTORIES OF CHINESE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

The Reform of the Government: Responsibility, Capacity and Effects

Rethinking China's Government Reform Strategy from a Perspective of Government Performance:A Survey of Local Government Civil Servants

Problems and Optimization Suggestions of Rural Public Management under Rural Revitalization

Rural Reform in Contemporary China: Development, Efficiency, and Fairness

Governmental Functionsin Rural Environmental Management

Research on the Performance Management Problems in Local Governments' Administrative Service Centers and the Countermeasures

Eco-efficiency and effectiveness evaluation toward sustainable urban development in China: a super-efficiency SBM–DEA with undesirable outputs