Abstract:The orientation of the function of urban communities is a fundamental issue in the construction of urban communities. However, there remain some misunderstandings in the current studies and practices of urban community construction in China. First of all, the government and many researchers often equate the function of communities with that of community organizations. Secondly, they may equate the function of communities with how to transfer various social security and welfare functions previously undertaken by work units and organizations to urban communities. Thirdly, they may equate the function of communities with that of traditional communities. In addition, these misunderstandings have given rise to some ″unexpected ″ negative consequences in the urban community construction. There are two most serious ones. First, the organization and operation of almost all urban communities in China are increasingly becoming over-organized or executive. Second, citizens have little sense of participation in urban communities and construction of urban communities, which leads to a situation in which the government is ′enthusiastic ′ whereas the society is ′indifferent ′.The present paper holds the opinion that the discussion of the functional orientation of urban communities ought to be in accordance with the transition of the fundamental structure of the state-society relationship. Under the condition in which the state, market, and non-profit organizations each exerts unique functions, the function of urban communities should neither replace nor obstruct the function of these organizations. Urban communities must exert their unique functions to be one institutional existence in the society. This unique function is to construct public spheres in the urban society and through this construction, urban communities become a medium and mechanism by which various social activists can express their desires, interests, and communicate with others. These public spheres are not the spheres where the state is in opposition with the society, but rather spheres which mediate the relationship between the state and the society. This sort of public spheres is simultaneously influenced by the state and the society, but it has its peculiar character and logic beyond the influence of the state and the society.

Division of Tasks and Cooperation Between Government and the Community: an Essential Condition for the Reform and Innovation of China'S Community-Building System

The Evolution of China Labor Market and Government Behavior

The Relationship Between Government on One Side and the Market and Society on the Other in China's Agricultural and Rural Development: an Analytical Framework

The Fragmentation of Community:An Empirical Study on Community Building and Urban Social Governance in Y City

On Position of Future Community Construction in China

Reform Agenda For The Building Of Service-Oriented Government In China: Implications From Welfare Regime Analysis

China’s Public Service System:Developments of Social Policy, Institution and Mechanism

Community Development Is An Important Prerequisite for Social Management Innovation and Harmonious City

Urban Community Governance: Confusion and Thinking

The Community Basis for Constructing Harmonious Society:a Theoretic Exploration

In Search of a Long-Term Development Path for China: Starting from Differences between Assigning Responsibility and Contracting

Citizen Social Right in China:Retrospection,Reality and Suggestion for Policy-making

Building Service Government:the Intrinsic Requirement of Building the Harmonious Society

Re-orientating the Function of Urban Communities to Construct Urban Public Spheres

Re-establishing the Role of Government in Social Welfare in China

Core Reconstruction of China’s Economic System Reform:the Relationship between Government and Market

How is a Community Society Possible?-Based on the Re-study of the Five Cities' Communities in China

Development and Functions of Community Non-Governmental Organizations

Community Governance Reform in Urban China: A Case Study of the Yantian Model in Shenzhen

Community Integrated Management Reform and Innovation Research：Based on the New Public Management Perspective

On Building of Community and Harmonious Socialism