Abstract:The development of popular Islamic media in the digital era, associated with an authority shift from traditional to popular religion, has enhanced peoples’ ways of thinking. Ironically, conservative and radical Islamic models have dominated the digital space. Therefore, in response to this phenomenon, this research examines how the mainstreaming strategy of religious moderation is carried out by moderate groups, specifically a non-affiliated Islamic portal called Islami.co, with the tagline “Enlightening and Friendly Islamic Media.” This research also analyzed articles, concepts, and perspectives to determine whether they are in the moderate category using the Jürgen Habermas’ theory of communicative rationality. Furthermore, the essays in the islami.co were analyzed according to three kinds of validity claims, namely truth, accuracy, and honesty. This study concluded that mainstreaming religious moderation through this islami.co’s media significantly impacts the community as a filter from news content or thoughts that do not reflect the Islamic value of mercy to all mankind. Islami.co’s writers continuously endeavor to test conservative-radical Islamic narratives that develop in a society with logical (aqli) and religious (naqli) arguments presented with brief and uncomplicated explanations. The strategy of popular Islamic portals such as islami.co is quite acceptable to middle-class Muslims, as often preached by the fundamentalist groups. Therefore, it is very appropriate to direct islami.co’s target audience to readers from the general public. Keywords: Religious moderation, digital space, Islami.co, communicative rationality, religious authority.

The Combat and the Cooperation Between Rationality and Religion: A Comment on the Debate Between J.Habermas and J.Ratzinge in Munchen

J. Habermas' and J. Ratzinger's Views on the Possibility and Necessity of Dialogue between Rationality and Religion

The Reconstruction of Communicative Rationality:The Logic Thread of Hagermas' Philosophy on the Emancipation of Mankind

The Entanglement of Psychologism and Logicism-To Review the Intellectual History of the Relevant Disputations between E. Husserl and W. Wundt

Criticism of Habermas' Communicative Action Theory

A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

The Intrinsic Logic Of Jurgen Habermas' "Religious Turn": A Study Focusing On Discourse Ethics

Dilemma of Modernity and Reconstruction of Rationality

“One Would at Least Like to Be Asked”

From M.Weber's "Value neutrality" to Harbermas' "Communicative Rationality"

Hegel on the State and Religion——An interpretation to the Remark of §270 in Elements of the Philosophy of Right

Post-Secularism as a Basis of Dialogue between Philosophy and Religion

Habermas and the Ethics of Kant and Hegel

Possibility of Social Cooperation: Ricoeur's Improvement of Habermas' Discourse Ethics

Discourse Ethic: Between the Tradition and the Postmodern

The Possibility of Rational Discussion in the Value Domain

Mainstreaming Religious Moderation in the Digital Space: An Examination of Islami.co Web Portal in the Perspective of Jürgen Habermas’ Communicative Rationality

On Habermas's Theories on Civil Society

The Possibility to Free Gods from Contesting?-The Cruxes and Opportunities to Carry out Interreligious Dialogues

Arguing, Bargaining and all that: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations

On the Blasphemy of Reason and Path of Criticism