Abstract:The development of popular Islamic media in the digital era, associated with an authority shift from traditional to popular religion, has enhanced peoples’ ways of thinking. Ironically, conservative and radical Islamic models have dominated the digital space. Therefore, in response to this phenomenon, this research examines how the mainstreaming strategy of religious moderation is carried out by moderate groups, specifically a non-affiliated Islamic portal called Islami.co, with the tagline “Enlightening and Friendly Islamic Media.” This research also analyzed articles, concepts, and perspectives to determine whether they are in the moderate category using the Jürgen Habermas’ theory of communicative rationality. Furthermore, the essays in the islami.co were analyzed according to three kinds of validity claims, namely truth, accuracy, and honesty. This study concluded that mainstreaming religious moderation through this islami.co’s media significantly impacts the community as a filter from news content or thoughts that do not reflect the Islamic value of mercy to all mankind. Islami.co’s writers continuously endeavor to test conservative-radical Islamic narratives that develop in a society with logical (aqli) and religious (naqli) arguments presented with brief and uncomplicated explanations. The strategy of popular Islamic portals such as islami.co is quite acceptable to middle-class Muslims, as often preached by the fundamentalist groups. Therefore, it is very appropriate to direct islami.co’s target audience to readers from the general public. Keywords: Religious moderation, digital space, Islami.co, communicative rationality, religious authority.

J. Habermas' and J. Ratzinger's Views on the Possibility and Necessity of Dialogue between Rationality and Religion

The Combat and the Cooperation Between Rationality and Religion: A Comment on the Debate Between J.Habermas and J.Ratzinge in Munchen

The Reconstruction of Communicative Rationality:The Logic Thread of Hagermas' Philosophy on the Emancipation of Mankind

The Entanglement of Psychologism and Logicism-To Review the Intellectual History of the Relevant Disputations between E. Husserl and W. Wundt

The Intrinsic Logic Of Jurgen Habermas' "Religious Turn": A Study Focusing On Discourse Ethics

The Possibility to Free Gods from Contesting?-The Cruxes and Opportunities to Carry out Interreligious Dialogues

Husserl and Buddhism | Husserl in budizem

From M.Weber's "Value neutrality" to Harbermas' "Communicative Rationality"

Post-Secularism as a Basis of Dialogue between Philosophy and Religion

Criticism of Habermas' Communicative Action Theory

“One Would at Least Like to Be Asked”

Dilemma of Modernity and Reconstruction of Rationality

Hegel on the State and Religion——An interpretation to the Remark of §270 in Elements of the Philosophy of Right

Possibility of Social Cooperation: Ricoeur's Improvement of Habermas' Discourse Ethics

The Possibility of Rational Discussion in the Value Domain

Habermas and the Ethics of Kant and Hegel

Harmony in Differences:The Possibility of a Dialogue between Confucianism and Christianity

Creative or Constrictive:a Comparative Study on Hermeneutic Ideas Between Heidegger and Eco

Luhmann, Habermas and the Theory of Communication

Pragma-Dialectics: from a Perspective of Critical Thinking

Mainstreaming Religious Moderation in the Digital Space: An Examination of Islami.co Web Portal in the Perspective of Jürgen Habermas’ Communicative Rationality