Rise of the Discipline of Communication——A Period of Re-interpretated History

HU Yi-qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.2009.01.007
2009-01-01
Abstract:When the discipline of communication was established,the structural functionalism,represented by Colombia School,was chosen as the research paradigm instead of that stood for by Chicago School.Despite Colombia School's little advantage on theory and method,its theoretical outcome could be more easily used by ideology,its quantitative method could provide the evidence in an easier way for the authorities to make the decision,and its research paradigm could be used more easily to define the boundary of communication discipline and bring more resources for it.Therefore,Schramm,who was eager to lay the border of the professionalism of communication,chose Colombia School without too much consideration.However,this choice has led to the dilemma that communication is not only highly controlled by ideology,but also formed as a very conservative and closed disciplinarity.All this has contributed to the doubt of the legality of communication discipline since 1970s.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?