On the Conflict and Accommodation of Educational Research Discourses
Dong Yunchuan,Li Baoyu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13236/j.cnki.jshe.2022.12.001
2022-01-01
Abstract:With different positions and roles, discourses of educational research are naturally different. In the discourse world of education research, there are mainly three kinds of discourse systems: the power discourse issued by education administrators, the theoretical discourse created by experts and scholars, and the practical discourse conveyed by front-line teachers and students. The three are unique ways to regulate, interpret, and understand education events, which should echo and complement each other to promote the prosperity of the discourse system of education research. Currently, the discourses of educational research contain conflicts and dislocations, which are respectively reflected in the discourse game between administrative guidance and academic guidance, the discourse contrast between theoretical and practical expression, and the discourse imbalance between the demand of educating people and the tendency of seeking profits, and present a picture of "research prosperity" and "academic decline". The reasons for this phenomenon lie in the hijacking of "research education" to educational research, the replacement of educational discourse to pedagogical discourse, the alienation of administration and academia from educational life, and the shielding of educational issues by educational topics. Looking ahead, high-quality educational research needs to return to the standard of educational life, uphold professional discourse logic, and face the deep-seated contradictions in educational development.