Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

On Execution of Power of Sentencing Suggestion and Strengthening Supervision over Criminal Justice

On Suggestion of Expert in Justice

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

Judicial Application of Restrictive Commutation of Death Penalty with Suspension: Comment on No. 12 Guiding Case of the Supreme People's Court

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

On Civil Prosecutorial Suggestion

Discussion on the System of Sentencing Proposal

Re-Classification and Theoretical Study of the Civil Prosecutorial Suggestions

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

On the Investigation of Sentencing Information

On the Independence of Sentencing Process

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

A Research of the Dynamic Mechanism of Criminal Procuratorial Organs to Protect Our Laws

Several Ideas concerning the Reform of the Supervision of Legal Proceedings

On the Reform and Perfecting of Adjudication Supervision of People's Procuratorate

On the Executive Power Specialization of the Community Correction in China

Support from Substantial Law in the Reform of Sentencing Procedure

On Discretionary Mechanism of Penalty for Minor Offenders

On the Sentencing Discretion of Punishment Aimed at Prevention