Abstract:Background Together with diagnosis and treatment planning, a good knowledge of the root canal system and its frequent variations is a necessity for successful root canal therapy. The selection of instrumentation techniques for variants in internal anatomy of teeth has significant effects on the shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness. The aim of this study was to reveal the differences made by including variations in the internal anatomy of premolars into the study protocol for investigation of a single instrumentation technique (hand ProTaper instruments) assessed by microcomputed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction. Methods Five single-root premolars, whose root canal systems were classified into one of five types, were scanned with micro-CT before and after preparation with a hand ProTaper instrument. Instrumentation characteristics were measured quantitatively in 3-D using a customized application framework based on MeVisLab. Numeric values were obtained for canal surface area, volume, volume changes, percentage of untouched surface, dentin wall thickness, and the thickness of dentin removed. Preparation errors were also evaluated using a color-coded reconstruction. Results Canal volumes and surface areas were increased after instrumentation. Prepared canals of all five types were straightened, with transportation toward the inner aspects of S-shaped or multiple curves. However, a ledge was formed at the apical third curve of the type II canal system and a wide range in the percentage of unchanged canal surfaces (27.4-83.0%) was recorded. The dentin walls were more than 0.3 mm thick except in a 1 mm zone from the apical surface and the hazardous area of the type II canal system after preparation with an F3 instrument. Conclusions The 3-D color-coded images showed different morphological changes in the five types of root canal systems shaped with the same hand instrumentation technique. Premolars are among the most complex teeth for root canal treatment and instrumentation techniques for the root canal systems of premolars should be selected individually depending on the 3-D canal configuration of each tooth. Further study is needed to demonstrate the differences made by including variations in the internal anatomy of teeth into the study protocol of clinical RCT for identifying the best preparation technique.

Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.

Clinical Analysis of the Separation of the Rotary ProTaper Nickel-Titanium Files during Root Canal Therapy

Analysis of Mtwo Rotary Instrument Separation During Endodontic Therapy: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APICAL EXTRUSION OF DEBRIS AND SHAPING ABILITY IN CURVED ROOT CANALS USING FOUR DIFFERENT NITI INSTRUMENTS

Clinical analysis of reasons for breaking of Hand ProTaper Nickel-titanium files during root canal therapy

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of ultrasonic tips versus the Terauchi file retrieval kit for the removal of separated endodontic instruments

Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study

Investigation of fracture prevalence of instruments used in root canal treatments at a faculty of dentistry: a prospective study

[A Comparative Study of Three Different Rotary Nickel Titanium Systems in the Preparation of Curved Molar Canals].

The Effect of a Manual Instrumentation Technique on Five Types of Premolar Root Canal Geometry Assessed by Microcomputed Tomography and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction.

Torsional behaviour of rotary NiTi ProTaper Universal instruments after multiple clinical use

Cleaning Effectiveness and Shaping Ability of Rotary Protaper Compared with Rotary Gt and Manual K-Flexofile

A comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals

Comparative evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using three different rotary file systems

Evaluation of apically extruded debris using protaper universal, protaper next, one curve, Xp shaper, and edge file: An in vitro study

Fracture Resistance of Roots in Mandibular Premolars Following Root Canal Instrumentation of Different Sizes.

Defects in ProTaper S1 Instruments after Clinical Use: Longitudinal Examination

Assessment of Incidence, Management and Contributory Factors of Root Canal Instrument Separation in an Endodontics Post- Graduate Program: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Root Canal Shaping Effect of Instruments with Offset Mass of Rotation in the Mandibular First Molar: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study

Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination