Abstract:Since the reforms and the implementation of the open door policy in 1978,industrialization and urbanization has greatly contributed to the rapid economic development in China.A continuously high rate of economic growth has resulted in vast increases in GDP and a sharp upward trend in per capita income over the period from 1978 to the present.Despite a nearly tenfold increase in per capita income across all provinces over the last three decades,regional disparities have evidently increased since the reforms.The collected data shows that the income disparities in China mainly demonstrate themselves as interregional disparities instead of intraregional disparities.The rapid urbanization in China has led to farmers losing land,resulting in new types of urban and rural poverty.Around many big cities in China,people can see the metropolitan city life coexisting with poor county life.However,Zhejiang province has been maintaining a good balanced development within its region by relying on the booming private sector and the integral/concrete urbanization,and the regional disparities and rural-urban inequality have been successfully controlled and effectively eliminated.Welfare and economic development have been traditional alternatives for the elimination of the regional disparities.Specifically,inter-regional and intra-regional integration is important for reducing regional disparities and pursuing income equality.As far as China is concerned,the central government should take more responsibilities to improve the social security rights for citizens,while the local governments should spend more efforts in stimulating the local development.The successful experiences in Zhejiang and Jiangsu have demonstrated that the development of the private sector is the best measure in tackling the issues of regional imbalanced development.In combination with a more perfect regional market system,urbanization and rural-urban integration,we will be able to gradually reduce and restrain regional disparities and income disparities.

An Economic Analysis on Local Benefit Equilibrium and Local Benefit Harmony in China

Benefit distribution in urban renewal from the perspectives of efficiency and fairness: A game theoretical model and the government's role in China

"Balancing Urban and Rural Development" and Local Government:A Case Study on Changxing County in Zhejiang Province

The Distortion of the Labor Market,the Difference in its Efficiency,and the Income Disparity between Peasants and Town People

On Local Government Function Change and Area Development Model Choice in China

The Informal Constraint of Local Governments:A case study of conflict between law and folk conventions

The Imbalanced Development of China's Regional Economy:Cause Analysis

The Conception and Theoretical Evidence of Promoting the Harmonious Development of Urban and Rural Areas

Transfer of Urban Benefit:A Theoretical Proposition of Rural Revitalization

The Community Basis for Constructing Harmonious Society:a Theoretic Exploration

The Network Governance of Local Government and The Construction of Harmonious Society

Study on the Harmonization of Trans-districts in Terrains of Districts Boundary

Local Economic Structure and Balance Development in Chinese Economy

Benefit Conflicts and Program Defects of the Operation of Village Combination in China's Countryside: Also on the Practice Model of Developed Countries

Research on the Central and Local Governments' Boundary in China's Economic Development——From the Perspective of Incomplete Contract Theory

Central-Local Divergence in Low-income Housing Policy Approach——Decision Modeling Analysis Using the Analytic Network Process

The Coordination of the Relationship Between Central and Local Governments in the Transitional Period:Features,Tendency and Approach Analysis

Social Quality Theory and the Construction of A Harmonious Society

Dynamics of Central–local Relations in China’s Social Welfare System

A Theory Towards the Selective Public Goods Provision Behavior of China’s Local Government

Economic Analysis on the Structure of Interests of Central and Local Government