Spinal stability reconstruction after total spondylectomy due to thoracolumbar tumor

WEI Feng,LIU Zhongjun,DANG Gengting
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2006.11.002
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore five different spinal stability reconstruction methods after total spondylectomy due to thoracolumbar tumor.Method:From 1993 to 2003,72 patients with thoracolumbar (T5~L5) tumors were treated in our hospital.Among them,12 cases accepted spondylectomy and were followed up thoroughly.All of the 12 cases had complete radiological materials.Follow-up ranged from 2.5 years to 13 years,averaging 6.6 years.No recurrence or metastasis was noted among them.The tumors in this group consisted of 9 giant cell tumors,2 solitary plasmacytomas and one non-Hodgkin lymphoma.One stage anterior and posterior approach spondylectomies were performed in 11 patients and subspondylectomy in one patient.Five different spinal stability reconstructions were used after the resection,including (1)anterior instrumentation with shortsegmental posterior instrumentation(ASP) in 5 cases;(2)combined anterior instrumentation with multisegmental posterior instrumentation(AMP) in 4 cases;(3)short-segmental posterior instrumentation(SP) in one case;(4)multilevel posterior instrumentation(MP) in one case;(5)anterior instrumentation(A) in one case.Kyphosic Cobb angles were measured in the lateral radiographic films before and immediate after the surgery and at the final follow-up.Status of bony fusion and the subsidence of the intervertibral strut were documented.Result:The Cobb angles in 5 ASP cases lost 0°~7°,averaging 2.4°.Bony fusion were evidenced in all cases and no graft fractures were found.Mild subsidence of the mesh occurred in one case due to the endplate injury in the surgery.In the 4 cases of AMP group,the Cobb angles lost 0°~9°,averaging 5°.Bony fusion was obtained in all cases without fracture and implant subsidence.One patient undergoing AMP reconstruction had his posterior implant taken out after 1.5 years of his initial surgery.While left anterior instrumentation unintact after the second surgery.As a result,the graft was found fracture and the kyphosis developed.The Cobb angle losses in SP and MP patients were 12° and 13° separately.All with grafts failure.No Cobb angle loss was found in the subspondylectomy and anterior instrumented patient.The graft was fused well with no graft fracture or implant subsidence.Conclusions:ASP and AMP provide rigid stability after total spondylectomy,which improve the bony fusion rate and prevent the Cobb angle loss and the occurence of kyphosis.But ASP is preferred because it can save more movement segments.SP and A are not suitable to use alone after the total spondylectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?