Risk factors of unsuccessful endoscopic submucosal dissection

韩铁妹,张晨静,潘文胜,叶再元,徐翔,吾红光,陈光兰
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the risk factors of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) by summarizing clinical and pathological characteristics of patients who underwent unsuccessful ESD procedure,for a better guidance to clinical pathways and treatment decision.Methods Forty-one patients,who had ESD procedure and were pathologically diagnosed as mucosal or submucosal lesions(excluding heterotopic pancreas liomyoma and lipomyoma) were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into two groups according to ESD procedure being successful or not.Factors including sex,age,lesion location,type,size,procedure duration,pathology,lifting sign and complications were analyzed.Results Among all,thirty cases had successful and complete dissection while 11 cases failed(10 had surgery and the other one had adenoma residual and underwent close follow-up).The analysis showed significant difference in lifting sign between the two groups(P<0.05).The logistic regression analysis showed that lifting sign was the only independent risk factor of ESD procedure.In those 11 unsuccessful cases,two failed due to adhesion caused by tumor infiltration into submucosa with negative lifting sign;five failed due to fibrosis adhesion with negative lifting sign;one suffered obvious vagovagal reflex;another one had vessel infiltration in post-ESD pathology;the other two had muscle bundle extending exceptionally from muscular layer into mucosal layer,crossing submucosa,which made the dissection of the lesions impossible.Conclusions Negative lifting sign was the only independent risk factor which may serve as indicator of an unsuccessful ESD procedure.And not only adhesion from fibration and tumor infiltration but also exceptional growth of muscle bundle from muscular layer into mucosal layer could result in negative lifting sign.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?