Abstract:What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict.

Crimean War and the Development of the British Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century

On the Historical Significance of the Baltic War in 1854

The Conservative Trend of British Politics During French Revolution

B.N. Chicherin: The Crimean War as a Reflection of the Crisis of the Russian Empire

A Brief History of Cold War Liberalism

Peaceful Diplomacy and European Balance of Power——British Foreign Policies During Viscount Castlereagh and George Canning

The Crimean War and the Kingdom of Sardinia

The New Liberals and Chinese Civilization: Idealist Philosophy, Evolutionary Sociology, and the Quest for a Humanitarian Ethics in Edwardian Britain

British Social Reform at the Start of the 20th Century with Its Influence

The Trusteeship of Liberal Imperialism:Views on Asia and Africa from Edmund Burke and J.A.Hobson

The Emergence of Liberalism in China and Its Significance in the Period of after World War Ⅱ

Researches of British History in China since the Reform and Opening-up

FROM THE GREAT GAME TO THE COLD WAR: SMALL WARS ON THE EAST IN THE BRITISH AND RUSSIAN MILITARY THOUGHT IN THE FIRST THIRD OF THE 20TH CENTURY

The Establishment of British Modern Party Politics

Lessons of History: Appealing to the Experience of the Crimean War on the Pages of the Military Press during the Revolutionary Crisis of 1905–1907

The Historical Development of Western Political Civilization

Civilising Violence: International Law and Colonial War in the British Empire, 1850–1900

The Development of British Civil Servants Classification System for China's Enlightenment

Classical Liberalism in China: Some History and Prospects.

The Theory and Practice of Liberal State in Germany in the Early 19th Century

A "Revolution" Coming Late: The British Dispute about Its Parliamentary Sovereignty