IMMUNOGENECITY AND PROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF AN ORAL VACCINE MICROPARTICLE AGAINST AEROMONAS HYDROPHILA IN GRASS CARP (CTENOPHARYNGODON IDELLA)

DING Shi-hua,WANG Yi-ding,PENG Yuan-yi,SUN Han-chang,DENG Li-rong,LI Ying-wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-9868.2005.06.035
2005-01-01
Abstract:Vaccine microparticles were prepared using the solvent evaporation method.Their effects were investigated in grass carp(Ctenopharyngodon idella) by oral administration of three doses of 10 mg CE(cell envelops)-entrapped microparticles(containing 231 μg protein) or 10 mg WC(whole cell)-entrapped microparticles(containing 612 μg protein) in 4 weeks.Antibodies in the serum and the intestinal mucus were detected by ELISA.The protective effects of the vaccine microparticles were examined by bacterial challenge.The PLG [poly(lactide-co-glycolide)] microparticles entrapping the cell envelopes or the killed whole cells were obtained,both of which elicited higher serum antibody responses and lower intestinal mucus antibody level.After challenge with 20 LD_(50) of Aeromonas hydrophila,the survival rate of the fish receiving cell envelopes or whole-cell vaccine was 46.7% or 36.7%,and their relative survival rate was(42.9%) or 32.1%,respectively.In contrast,the survival rate of the control grass carp,which had received free microparticles,was a mere 6.7%.It is thus concluded that both vaccine microparticles in this study had a significant protective effect on grass carp and might be used as effective fish vaccines against Aeromonas hydrophila infection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?