Therapeutic Effect Comparison Between 32p Contact, Microwave and Freezing Treatment in Wart Vulgaris

MA Yu-bo,SUN Xiao-guang,LIU Yi-wen,CHEN Mei-juan,LU Ping,HUANG Gang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2005.12.023

2005-01-01

Abstract:Objective To assess and evaluate the therapeutic effect of ~(32)P contact therapy for warts vulgaris and compared it with microwave and freezing therapy. Methods Four hundred and sixty warts vulgaris patients were included.The diagnosis was made by history and typical skin lesion.The patients were randomly divided into three groups: 153 cases microwave therapy group,153 cases freezing therapy groups and 154 cases ~(32)P contact therapy group. Recent and long term side effects and complications was followed up in more than 3 months. Results The cure rate,relapse rate, incidence of side effect and complications in ~(32)P contact therapy group was 92.9%, 7.8%, 18.2% and 13.6% (respectively,) whereas in microwave therapy group 60.8%, 39.2%, 52.3% and 38.6% respectively,and in freezing therapy groups 51.6%,48.4%, (77.1%) and 35.3% respectively. There was significant different between ~(32)P contact therapy group with microwave therapy group and freezing therapy groups(P0.001). After ~(32)P contact therapy,(lesions) was caused by coagulating necrosis,and virus inclusion body within the cell was all disappeared 4 years (follow up) in three groups,none of the long term side effects and complications was found expect scar formation.( Conclusion )Compared with microwave and freezing treatment for warts vulgaris ~(32)P contact therapy is simple,safe,painless,with high cure rate,low relapse,low side effect and complications,thereby it has good clinical value.