A comparative study of transesophageal atrial pacing and intracardiac electrophysiological studies in children

YANG Xiao-dong,WANG Jian-yi,HUANG Min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2012.09.028
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the accuracy of diagnosis and classification of supraventricular tachycardia(SVT)by transesophageal atrial pacing(TEAP)and intracardiac electrophysiologic studies(IEPS)in children,and evaluate the reliability of TEAP.Methods Results of TEAP and IEPS in 27 patients with SVT were compared.The included patients were hospitalized during the period from Aug.2000 to Oct.2008.Gender:12 males and 15 females,age:6-15 years[mean(10.1±2.5)years],had a recurrent SVT history.To assess sinus node recovery time(SNRT),corrected sinus node recovery time(CSNRT),sinoatrial conduction time(SACTc),effective refractory period(AERP),atrioventricular effective refractory period(AVERP)were recorded by TEAP and IEPS.Meantime,enckebach phenomenon block point and 2:1 block point of atrioventricular node were recorded by S1S1 incremental pacing.All electrophysiological parameters were statistically analyzed with SPSS software.Results In 27 cases of SVT,7 cases were atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT),20 cases were atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia(AVRT)(including 6 cases with left accessory pathway and 14 cases with right accessory pathway).All successful underwent RFCA.The classification diagnosis accuracy rate was 96.3% in TEAP.And then,we got electrophysiological parameters of IEPS and TEAP,SNRT were(912.2±180.3)ms and(930.2±174.9)ms,CSNRT were(304.0±79.7)ms and(287.1±63.1)ms,SACTc were(84.3±21.8)ms and(94.6±23.2)ms,AERP was(228.0±29.4)ms and(223.5±21.7)ms,AVERP were(298.5±71.8)ms and(277.7±57.5)ms,Wenckebach phenomenon points were(182.0±28.1)ms and(187.0±24.9)ms,2:1 block point were(211.0±24.7)ms and(220.0±19.3)ms,the P value>0.05.Conclusions The electrophysiological results of TEAP were reliable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?